Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-11301

Lunary ≤ 1.6.3

Public PoC
Published
20 March 2025
Modified
02 July 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3 6.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0055 43th percentile
Risk Priority 51 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-11301 is a medium-severity Improper Enforcement of a Single, Unique Action (CWE-837) vulnerability in Lunary Lunary. Its CVSS base score is 6.5 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked at the 43th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

This vulnerability is AI-related — categorised as LLM Application Platforms; in the Data-Related Vulnerabilities risk domain.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

In lunary-ai/lunary before version 1.6.3, the application allows the creation of evaluators without enforcing a unique constraint on the combination of projectId and slug. This allows an attacker to overwrite existing data by submitting a POST request with the same…

more

slug as an existing evaluator. The lack of database constraints or application-layer validation to prevent duplicates exposes the application to data integrity issues. This vulnerability can result in corrupted data and potentially malicious actions, impairing the system's functionality.

CWE(s)

AI Security AnalysisAI

AI Category
LLM Application Platforms
Risk Domain
Data-Related Vulnerabilities
OWASP Top 10 for LLMs 2025
None mapped
Classification Reason
Matched keywords: ai, lunary

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-1738Same product: Lunary Lunary
CVE-2024-5386Same product: Lunary Lunary
CVE-2024-6086Same product: Lunary Lunary
CVE-2024-5130Same product: Lunary Lunary
CVE-2024-10272Same product: Lunary Lunary
CVE-2024-1902Same product: Lunary Lunary
CVE-2024-5277Same product: Lunary Lunary
CVE-2024-8999Same product: Lunary Lunary
CVE-2024-10274Same product: Lunary Lunary
CVE-2024-1666Same product: Lunary Lunary

Affected Assets

lunary
lunary
≤ 1.6.3

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V6.3.3
  • V6.5.1
  • V7.6.2
  • V17.3.1

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

AC-3 enforces approved authorizations for actions; when policy requires an action to occur only once, proper enforcement directly stops duplicate execution.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-05 partial match
prevents

Authorization policy enforcement can include rules that restrict actions to a single use.

PR.IR-01 partial match
prevents

Logical access controls can incorporate mechanisms that block replay or repeated actions.

PR.PS-05 partial match
prevents

Preventing execution of unauthorized or duplicate actions directly addresses single-use enforcement.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

degrades

Access-control rules can enforce single-use or uniqueness constraints, but the control is broader than this specific weakness.

degrades

Managing access rights can include rules that limit an action to one occurrence, yet the control addresses rights in general.

prevents

Secure SDLC practices can require design controls for single-use actions, but the control addresses the entire lifecycle.

prevents

Application-security requirements can specify single-action enforcement, yet the control is wider in scope.

prevents

Secure-coding standards can mandate checks that prevent repeated actions, but the control covers many coding issues.

degrades

Information-access-restriction mechanisms can implement single-action limits, but the control covers broader access-restriction needs.

References