Security Resilience

CVE-2024-13086

Info Disclosure in Qnap Qts 5.0.0 – 5.2.0.2851

Published
07 March 2025
Modified
30 January 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 5.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0042 35th percentile
Risk Priority 44 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2024-13086 is a medium-severity Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor (CWE-200) vulnerability in Qnap Qts. Its CVSS base score is 5.3 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked at the 35th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and AC-4 (Information Flow Enforcement) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2024-13086 is an exposure of sensitive information vulnerability (CWE-200) affecting QNAP's QTS and QuTS hero operating systems. The issue enables remote attackers to access sensitive data, potentially compromising system security. It impacts versions prior to the patched releases, with the vulnerability formally published on March 7, 2025, and assigned a CVSS v3.1 base score of 5.3 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N).

Remote, unauthenticated attackers can exploit this vulnerability over the network with low complexity and no user interaction required. Successful exploitation allows disclosure of limited sensitive information without impacting integrity or availability, thereby enabling partial compromise of the affected system's security posture.

QNAP has addressed the vulnerability through patches in QTS 5.2.0.2851 build 20240808 and later, as well as QuTS hero h5.2.0.2851 build 20240808 and later. Security practitioners should prioritize updating affected devices, with full details available in the vendor advisory at https://www.qnap.com/en/security-advisory/qsa-25-03.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

An exposure of sensitive information vulnerability has been reported to affect product. If exploited, the vulnerability could allow remote attackers to compromise the security of the system. We have already fixed the vulnerability in the following version: QTS 5.2.0.2851 build…

more

20240808 and later QuTS hero h5.2.0.2851 build 20240808 and later

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-21902Same product: Qnap Qts
CVE-2023-45039Same product: Qnap Qts
CVE-2024-21897Same product: Qnap Qts
CVE-2023-50361Same product: Qnap Qts
CVE-2024-50401Same product: Qnap Qts
CVE-2024-37041Same product: Qnap Qts
CVE-2023-50366Same product: Qnap Qts
CVE-2024-27127Same product: Qnap Qts
CVE-2024-53691Same product: Qnap Qts
CVE-2024-21904Same product: Qnap Qts

Affected Assets

qnap
qts
5.0.0 — 5.2.0.2851
qnap
quts hero
h5.0.0 — h5.2.0.2851

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Access enforcement directly stops unauthorized actors from obtaining sensitive information.

Information flow enforcement structurally prevents sensitive data from reaching unauthorized recipients.

Protection of information at rest prevents unauthorized exposure of stored sensitive data.

Transmission confidentiality mechanisms stop exposure of sensitive data on the wire.

Least privilege reduces the set of actors who can reach sensitive information.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

blocks

A.5.10 only requires awareness, a topic-specific acceptable-use policy stating expected behaviours/monitoring, and procedures referencing classification and other controls; per the owner's explicit rule on labelling and similar dependency-style clauses, this does not itself prevent exposure (CWE-200) unless access/DLP/etc. act on it.

blocks

Requiring the return of all physical and electronic assets plus secure deletion of organizational data from personal devices reduces the chance that sensitive information remains accessible to departing personnel.

blocks

A.5.12 only defines and communicates a classification scheme so that protection needs can be understood; per the owner's explicit rule, labeling/classification does not itself prevent exposure and requires other controls (e.g. access enforcement) to act on it.

blocks

By requiring classification labels and metadata on all information assets, the control makes it harder for sensitive data to be inadvertently exposed because downstream systems and users can recognize and enforce handling rules based on those labels.

blocks

Requiring encryption, access controls, and recipient authentication for transfers directly reduces the chance that sensitive data reaches an unauthorized observer.

blocks

Secure delivery, protected storage, and confidentiality of allocation records limit exposure of authentication material to unauthorized observers.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

References