Security Resilience

CVE-2024-13497

XSS in Tripetto ≤ 8.0.10

Published
15 March 2025
Modified
28 March 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.2
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0032 23th percentile
Risk Priority 55 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2024-13497 is a high-severity Basic XSS (CWE-80) vulnerability in Tripetto Tripetto. Its CVSS base score is 7.2 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Junk Data (T1001.001); ranked at the 23th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2024-13497 is a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Tripetto plugin for WordPress, a form builder for contact forms, surveys, and quizzes. It affects all versions up to and including 8.0.9 and stems from insufficient input sanitization and output escaping when handling attachment uploads. This flaw, associated with CWE-79 (Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation) and CWE-80 (Improper Neutralization of Script-Related HTML Tags in a Web Page), has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.2 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N).

Unauthenticated attackers can exploit this vulnerability over the network with low complexity and no user interaction required. By uploading malicious attachments containing arbitrary web scripts, attackers can inject code that executes in the context of pages displaying the uploaded files whenever any user, including administrators, accesses them. This leads to potential theft of session cookies, account takeover, or further site compromise due to the changed scope (S:C).

Mitigation details are available in plugin advisories and code references. The Wordfence threat intelligence page provides vulnerability analysis, while WordPress plugin trac links show the vulnerable code in attachments.php (line 46) and a changeset applying fixes between revisions 3231968 and 3251202 in the trunk branch, indicating that updating to a version beyond 8.0.9 resolves the issue. Security practitioners should urge site owners to update the Tripetto plugin immediately.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

The WordPress form builder plugin for contact forms, surveys and quizzes – Tripetto plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via attachment uploads in all versions up to, and including, 8.0.9 due to insufficient input sanitization and output…

more

escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses the uploaded file.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1001.001 Junk Data Command And Control
Adversaries may add junk data to protocols used for command and control to make detection more difficult.
T1001.003 Protocol or Service Impersonation Command And Control
Adversaries may impersonate legitimate protocols or web service traffic to disguise command and control activity and thwart analysis efforts.
T1003.003 NTDS Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to access or create a copy of the Active Directory domain database in order to steal credential information, as well as obtain other information about domain members such as devices, users, and access rights.
T1003.004 LSA Secrets Credential Access
Adversaries with SYSTEM access to a host may attempt to access Local Security Authority (LSA) secrets, which can contain a variety of different credential materials, such as credentials for service accounts.
T1003.005 Cached Domain Credentials Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to access cached domain credentials used to allow authentication to occur in the event a domain controller is unavailable.
T1003.006 DCSync Credential Access
Adversaries may attempt to access credentials and other sensitive information by abusing a Windows Domain Controller's application programming interface (API)(Citation: Microsoft DRSR Dec 2017) (Citation: Microsoft GetNCCChanges) (Citati…
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-5933Shared CWE-79, CWE-80
CVE-2026-25578Shared CWE-79, CWE-80
CVE-2024-6183Shared CWE-79, CWE-80
CVE-2025-11966Shared CWE-79, CWE-80
CVE-2024-52597Shared CWE-79, CWE-80
CVE-2024-42195Shared CWE-79, CWE-80
CVE-2024-32966Shared CWE-79, CWE-80
CVE-2025-66472Shared CWE-79, CWE-80
CVE-2023-0007Shared CWE-79, CWE-80
CVE-2023-35006Shared CWE-79, CWE-80

Affected Assets

tripetto
tripetto
≤ 8.0.10

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.1.2
  • V1.3.2
  • V1.2.1
  • V1.3.1

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover missing or incorrect neutralization of script tags through targeted XSS test cases.

Input validation explicitly requires checking and neutralizing untrusted web inputs containing script-related characters before they reach a downstream renderer.

Output filtering can catch or sanitize unneutralized script content before it is served to users.

Secure engineering principles include mandatory output encoding and neutralization of HTML metacharacters to stop injection at the source.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
blocks

Secure SDLC practices directly target introduction of XSS via coding standards/testing (mostly), yet the single broad outcome leaves many specific neutralization vectors unaddressed (partial).

PR.PS-02 partial match
blocks

Patching and EOL replacement can remediate known XSS instances in libraries or frameworks (partial) but do nothing to enforce input neutralization in application code (none).

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

removes
removes
removes
removes
blocks

A.5.6 only promotes membership in groups to improve knowledge, receive alerts, and share information; it performs no action that stops XSS exploitation (or even the underlying neutralization defect) and is a pure dependency for other controls per the owner's labeling rule.

References