CVE-2024-23485
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:NCVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.
Summary
CVE-2024-23485 is a medium-severity Improperly Preserved Integrity of Hardware Configuration State During a Power Save/Restore Operation (CWE-1304) vulnerability in Gallagher Controller (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 4.6 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique NTDS (T1003.003); ranked at the 8th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to CP-10 (System Recovery and Reconstitution) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2024-20983
Vulnerability Data
Improperly Preserved Integrity of Hardware Configuration State During a Power Save/Restore Operation (CWE-1304) in the Controller 6000 and 7000 can lead to secured door locks connected via Aperio Communication Hubs to momentarily allow free access. This issue affects: Gallagher Controller…
more
6000 and 7000 9.10 prior to vCR9.10.240520a (distributed in 9.10.1268(MR1)), 9.00 prior to vCR9.00.240521a (distributed in 9.00.1990(MR3)), 8.90 prior to vCR8.90.240520a (distributed in 8.90.1947 (MR4)), 8.80 prior to vCR8.80.240520a (distributed in 8.80.1726 (MR5)), 8.70 prior to vCR8.70.240520a (distributed in 8.70.2824 (MR7)), all versions of 8.60 and prior.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Mandates recovery and reconstitution of the system to a known state, which structurally prevents unverified configuration state after power operations.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Hardware monitoring can detect resulting anomalies but does not prevent or ensure integrity during the power operation itself.
Configuration management practices directly require preserving verified hardware state across power transitions.
Verifying integrity of restored assets explicitly covers hardware configuration state after power or other restore operations.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
A.8.32 mandates a formal, documented change-management process (planning, authorization, testing, deployment, records) to preserve security during changes; it does not address or stop exploitation of a hardware-level power-save/restore bug that fails to preserve configuration integrity.
A.8.9 defines, records, monitors and enforces secure configuration templates and change control; it has no bearing on preserving hardware configuration integrity across a power-save/restore cycle, so the weakness can still be present and exploitable.