CVE-2024-23981
Intel Ethernet 800 Series Controllers Driver ≤ 28.3
Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XSummary
CVE-2024-23981 is a critical-severity Wrap-around Error (CWE-128) vulnerability in Intel Ethernet 800 Series Controllers Driver. Its CVSS base score is 9.3 (Critical).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 8th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2024-21407
Vulnerability Data
Wrap-around error in Linux kernel mode driver for some Intel(R) Ethernet Network Controllers and Adapters before version 28.3 may allow an authenticated user to potentially enable escalation of privilege via local access.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V15.2.2
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation can discover wrap-around conditions through static analysis or test cases.
Requiring documented development processes and standards can enforce coding rules and tool usage that reduce introduction of calculation errors.
Security engineering principles include use of safe arithmetic constructs and bounded types that structurally avoid wrap-around.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly prevent wrap-around via safe arithmetic, bounds checks, and language features, but the control addresses many additional weakness classes.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing can detect wrap-around errors through boundary and fuzz testing.
Secure development lifecycle includes input validation and bounds checking that can prevent wrap-around errors.
Application security requirements can mandate integer overflow protection and safe arithmetic.
Secure architecture principles include use of safe data types and overflow detection mechanisms.
Secure coding standards directly require avoidance of integer overflow and wrap-around conditions.