Security Resilience

CVE-2024-24257

Published
26 July 2024
Modified
15 April 2026
CVSS Score v3.1 7.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0039 31th percentile
Risk Priority 57 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2024-24257 is a high-severity Special Element Injection (CWE-75) vulnerability in Github (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).

Operationally, ranked at the 31th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

An issue in skteco.com Central Control Attendance Machine web management platform v.3.0 allows an attacker to obtain sensitive information via a crafted script to the csl/user component.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-35373Shared CWE-75
CVE-2025-50213Shared CWE-75
CVE-2023-1758Shared CWE-75
CVE-2024-0801Shared CWE-75
CVE-2024-58362Shared CWE-75
CVE-2026-54771Shared CWE-75
CVE-2024-31812Shared CWE-75
CVE-2024-31806Shared CWE-75
CVE-2026-29042Shared CWE-75
CVE-2024-31809Shared CWE-75

Affected Assets

Github
—
inferred from references and description; NVD did not file a CPE for this CVE

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Input validation directly stops special-element injection by rejecting or sanitizing untrusted data before it reaches a different control plane.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.8.15 Logging partial match
finds

Logging can record injection attempts for detection but does not prevent the weakness.

blocks

A.8.25 mandates secure SDLC practices including secure coding guidelines, security requirements, checkpoints, testing (scans/penetration), and developer training that reach special-element injection in the development phase, but leaves a bounded remainder (e.g. outsourced development without full assurance per 8.30, incomplete enforcement of guidelines across all languages/projects, or post-development injection vectors).

blocks

Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection flaws including special-element handling.

blocks

A.8.27 mandates security engineering principles including data validation/sanitization, distrust external input, security by design, and design reviews against attack patterns; this directly stops special-element injection from being exploitable in most cases, with a bounded remainder in incomplete implementation or novel attack patterns.

prevents

Secure coding standards require rigorous input sanitization, directly eliminating CWE-75.

finds

Security testing catches injection vulnerabilities but does not itself implement the sanitization fix.

Hardening callouts derived

DISA STIG baselines are authored against specific weaknesses. Where this CVE cites a broad weakness class, the mapping is not asserted at that abstraction (owner ruling, 2026-09-25: grade only at Base and below), so no rule is shown here rather than a rule shown against the wrong grain.

  • No fine-grained STIG row for CWE-75, a class-level weakness, and none of its children carries one either.

References