Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-24851

Memory Safety in Automationdirect P3-550E Firmware 1.2.10.9 … 4.1.1.10

Public PoCMemory Safety
Published
28 May 2024
Modified
12 February 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.014 70th percentile
Risk Priority 60 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-24851 is a high-severity Buffer Access with Incorrect Length Value (CWE-805) vulnerability in Automationdirect P3-550E Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 30% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the Programming Software Connection FiBurn functionality of AutomationDirect P3-550E 1.2.10.9. A specially crafted network packet can lead to a buffer overflow. An attacker can send an unauthenticated packet to trigger this vulnerability.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
T1211 Exploitation for Stealth Stealth
Adversaries may exploit vulnerabilities to evade detection by hiding activity, suppressing logging, or operating within trusted or unmonitored components.
T1212 Exploitation for Credential Access Credential Access
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to collect credentials.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-24947Same product: Automationdirect P1-540
CVE-2024-24946Same product: Automationdirect P1-540
CVE-2024-24963Same product: Automationdirect P1-540
CVE-2024-24962Same product: Automationdirect P1-540
CVE-2024-24959Same product: Automationdirect P3-550E
CVE-2024-24957Same product: Automationdirect P3-550E
CVE-2024-24954Same product: Automationdirect P3-550E
CVE-2024-24958Same product: Automationdirect P3-550E
CVE-2024-24956Same product: Automationdirect P3-550E
CVE-2024-24955Same product: Automationdirect P3-550E

Affected Assets

automationdirect
p3-550e firmware
1.2.10.9, 4.1.1.10
automationdirect
p3-550 firmware
1.2.10.9, 4.1.1.10
automationdirect
p3-530 firmware
1.2.10.9, 4.1.1.10
automationdirect
p2-550 firmware
1.2.10.10, 4.1.1.10
automationdirect
p1-550 firmware
1.2.10.10, 4.1.1.10
automationdirect
p1-540 firmware
1.2.10.10, 4.1.1.10

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.4.1

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation (including fuzzing and static analysis) directly finds incorrect length values used in sequential buffer accesses.

Requiring documented secure-development standards and tools can mandate bounds-checked coding practices that avoid the weakness.

Secure engineering principles require explicit bounds checking and correct length calculations when performing buffer operations.

Input validation rejects or corrects malformed length values supplied from external sources before they reach buffer operations.

Memory protection mechanisms limit the blast radius when an incorrect length value causes an out-of-bounds access.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly prevent incorrect-length buffer operations via safe APIs, reviews, and testing.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability identification can discover buffer-length flaws but does not prevent their introduction.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Patching or replacing vulnerable software directly eliminates known instances of this coding weakness.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development can detect out-of-bounds accesses, but does not guarantee prevention.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates buffer-safety practices that directly prevent incorrect length values.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify buffer-size validation, but do not prescribe implementation details.

prevents

Secure architecture principles encourage bounds-checked APIs, yet leave concrete coding decisions to developers.

prevents

Secure coding explicitly requires correct buffer-length handling, eliminating CWE-805 when followed.

prevents

Change management can enforce review gates that catch unsafe memory operations before deployment.

References