Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-32945

Mattermost Mobile ≤ 2.17.0

Published
15 July 2024
Modified
21 November 2024
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 2.6
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0024 15th percentile
Risk Priority 25 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-32945 is a low-severity Missing Initialization of Resource (CWE-909) vulnerability in Mattermost Mattermost Mobile. Its CVSS base score is 2.6 (Low).

Operationally, ranked at the 15th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Mattermost Mobile Apps versions <=2.16.0 fail to protect against abuse of a globally shared MathJax state which allows an attacker to change the contents of a LateX post, by creating another post with specific macro definitions.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-3872Same product: Mattermost Mattermost Mobile
CVE-2025-1558Same product: Mattermost Mattermost Mobile
CVE-2025-30516Same product: Mattermost Mattermost Mobile
CVE-2025-21083Same product: Mattermost Mattermost Mobile
CVE-2026-22880Same product: Mattermost Mattermost Mobile
CVE-2025-20630Same product: Mattermost Mattermost Mobile
CVE-2025-20036Same product: Mattermost Mattermost Mobile
CVE-2024-45833Same product: Mattermost Mattermost Mobile
CVE-2024-39767Same product: Mattermost Mattermost Mobile
CVE-2025-0476Same product: Mattermost Mattermost Mobile

Affected Assets

mattermost
mattermost mobile
≤ 2.17.0

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover missing initialization through static analysis or test cases.

Documented development standards and processes can mandate initialization of critical resources.

Security engineering principles can require explicit resource initialization during design and coding.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require proper resource initialization as part of coding standards and verification.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect missing initialization defects before deployment.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates initialization of resources before use.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify resource initialization checks.

prevents

Secure architecture principles include proper resource lifecycle management.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly require initialization of variables and resources.

none

Change management can enforce review of initialization logic during modifications.

References