Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-35273

Memory Safety in Fortinet Fortianalyzer 7.4.0 – 7.4.4

Published
14 January 2025
Modified
31 January 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.2
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0066 48th percentile
Risk Priority 54 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-35273 is a high-severity Out-of-bounds Write (CWE-787) vulnerability in Fortinet Fortianalyzer. Its CVSS base score is 7.2 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 48th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2024-35273 is an out-of-bounds write vulnerability (CWE-787) affecting Fortinet FortiManager versions 7.4.0 through 7.4.2 and FortiAnalyzer versions 7.4.0 through 7.4.2. The flaw arises from improper bounds checking, enabling an attacker to trigger the issue via specially crafted HTTP requests. It has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.2 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), indicating high severity due to its potential for significant impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

An authenticated attacker with high privileges (PR:H) can exploit this vulnerability remotely over the network (AV:N) with low complexity (AC:L) and no user interaction required (UI:N). By sending malicious HTTP requests, the attacker can achieve privilege escalation, potentially gaining unauthorized access to higher-level permissions or full system compromise within the affected FortiManager or FortiAnalyzer instances.

Fortinet has published advisory FG-IR-24-106 at https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-24-106, which provides details on mitigation, including available patches for the vulnerable versions. Security practitioners should consult this advisory for upgrade instructions and apply fixes promptly to affected systems.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A out-of-bounds write in Fortinet FortiManager version 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, FortiAnalyzer version 7.4.0 through 7.4.2 allows attacker to escalation of privilege via specially crafted http requests.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
T1211 Exploitation for Stealth Stealth
Adversaries may exploit vulnerabilities to evade detection by hiding activity, suppressing logging, or operating within trusted or unmonitored components.
T1212 Exploitation for Credential Access Credential Access
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to collect credentials.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-35276Same product: Fortinet Fortianalyzer
CVE-2024-33505Same product: Fortinet Fortianalyzer
CVE-2024-31496Same product: Fortinet Fortianalyzer
CVE-2023-22639Same vendor: Fortinet
CVE-2018-13383Same vendor: Fortinet
CVE-2023-42789Same vendor: Fortinet
CVE-2024-52963Same vendor: Fortinet
CVE-2023-22640Same vendor: Fortinet
CVE-2024-21762Same vendor: Fortinet
CVE-2023-33308Same vendor: Fortinet

Affected Assets

fortinet
fortianalyzer
7.4.0 — 7.4.4
fortinet
fortianalyzer cloud
7.4.1 — 7.4.3
fortinet
fortimanager
7.4.0 — 7.4.3
fortinet
fortimanager cloud
7.4.1 — 7.4.3

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation (including fuzzing and bounds checks) finds out-of-bounds write flaws before deployment.

Requiring documented secure-development standards and tools can mandate bounds-checked coding practices that avoid the weakness.

Input validation can structurally reject or sanitize data that would otherwise trigger an out-of-bounds write.

Memory-protection mechanisms limit the exploitability and blast radius of a successful out-of-bounds write.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure-development practices (static analysis, bounds checking, code review) are the primary means of preventing out-of-bounds writes.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability scanning and recording can discover out-of-bounds write flaws so they can be remediated.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Patching or replacing vulnerable software directly eliminates known instances of this coding weakness.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development and acceptance can detect and prevent out-of-bounds write defects.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates practices that prevent out-of-bounds writes.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify bounds-checking and safe memory handling.

prevents

Secure architecture and engineering principles reduce the likelihood of buffer overflows.

prevents

Secure coding directly addresses out-of-bounds writes through language choice and coding standards.

prevents

Change management can enforce review gates that catch unsafe memory operations before deployment.

References