CVE-2024-37664
Redmi Ax6S Firmware 1.0.57
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:HSummary
CVE-2024-37664 is a medium-severity Improper Verification of Source of a Communication Channel (CWE-940) vulnerability in Mi Redmi Ax6S Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 5.2 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique ARP Cache Poisoning (T1557.002); ranked at the 30th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-17 (Remote Access) and IA-3 (Device Identification and Authentication) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2024-36970
Vulnerability Data
Redmi router RB03 v1.0.57 is vulnerable to TCP DoS or hijacking attacks. An attacker in the same WLAN as the victim can disconnect or hijack the traffic between the victim and any remote server by sending out forged TCP RST…
more
messages to evict NAT mappings in the router.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V3.5.3V10.6.2V15.2.4
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
IA-3 requires unique identification and authentication of devices before any communication channel is established, directly stopping acceptance of unverified origins.
AC-17 mandates documented restrictions and authentication requirements for remote access, blocking channels whose origins are not properly verified.
SC-23 protects session authenticity, ensuring the source of an established communication channel is verified and cannot be spoofed.
SC-7 enforces monitoring and control at external and key internal interfaces, preventing channels from unverified sources via boundary rules.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Authentication of users/services/hardware directly enforces source verification for communication channels.
Verifying identity assertions prevents spoofed channel origins but does not cover all channel-establishment scenarios.
Network protections reduce unauthorized channel usage but do not specifically require origin verification at channel setup.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure authentication mechanisms verify the identity and origin of communication channel initiators.
Network security controls enforce source verification and channel authentication for incoming communications.
Security of network services includes validating the origin of service requests and connections.
Network segregation limits exposure but does not directly verify source of individual channels.
Cryptography can support channel authentication but does not inherently verify source without proper implementation.
Application security requirements may specify origin checks but do not mandate them.