Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-45783

Published
18 February 2025
Modified
29 June 2026
CVSS Score v3.1 4.4
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0022 13th percentile
Risk Priority 34 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-45783 is a medium-severity Improper Update of Reference Count (CWE-911) vulnerability. Its CVSS base score is 4.4 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 13th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A flaw was found in grub2. When failing to mount an HFS+ grub, the hfsplus filesystem driver doesn't properly set an ERRNO value. This issue may lead to a NULL pointer access.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
T1212 Exploitation for Credential Access Credential Access
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to collect credentials.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-46972Shared CWE-911
CVE-2026-46316Shared CWE-911
CVE-2023-22394Shared CWE-911
CVE-2023-2019Shared CWE-911
CVE-2026-46099Shared CWE-911
CVE-2024-43102Shared CWE-911
CVE-2023-5633Shared CWE-911
CVE-2026-52943Shared CWE-911
CVE-2026-42534Shared CWE-911

Affected Assets

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and analysis directly exercise reference-counted paths and reveal incorrect updates.

Documented development standards and tools can mandate safe reference-count patterns and static checks.

Engineering principles can require correct resource lifetime and reference management during design and implementation.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly prevent reference-count coding errors via reviews, static analysis, and testing.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development can detect reference-count defects before release, providing partial mitigation.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle practices can include reference-counting rules and automated checks that reduce the likelihood of improper updates.

prevents

Application security requirements can mandate correct resource-lifetime management, indirectly addressing reference-count errors.

prevents

Secure system architecture principles encourage explicit resource-ownership models that mitigate reference-count misuse.

prevents

Secure coding standards directly prescribe correct increment/decrement patterns, covering most instances of this weakness.

prevents

Change-management processes may catch reference-count issues introduced by modifications, but do not address the root coding flaw.

References