Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-47506

Juniper Junos ≤ 21.3

Published
11 October 2024
Modified
26 January 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v4 8.2
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:A/V:X/RE:M/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0029 21th percentile
Risk Priority 42 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-47506 is a high-severity Deadlock (CWE-833) vulnerability in Juniper Junos. Its CVSS base score is 8.2 (High).

Operationally, ranked at the 21th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-8 (Security and Privacy Engineering Principles) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A Deadlock vulnerability in the packet forwarding engine (PFE) of Juniper Networks Junos OS on SRX Series allows an unauthenticated, network-based attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS). When a large amount of traffic is processed by ATP Cloud…

more

inspection, a deadlock can occur which will result in a PFE crash and restart. Whether the crash occurs, depends on system internal timing that is outside the attackers control. This issue affects Junos OS on SRX Series: * All versions before 21.3R3-S1, * 21.4 versions before 21.4R3, * 22.1 versions before 22.1R2, * 22.2 versions before 22.2R1-S2, 22.2R2.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-30658Same product: Juniper Junos
CVE-2025-30645Same product: Juniper Junos
CVE-2024-39527Same product: Juniper Junos
CVE-2026-21920Same product: Juniper Junos
CVE-2025-6549Same product: Juniper Junos
CVE-2026-21914Same product: Juniper Junos
CVE-2026-33790Same product: Juniper Junos
CVE-2025-21592Same product: Juniper Junos
CVE-2026-33779Same product: Juniper Junos
CVE-2026-21906Same product: Juniper Junos

Affected Assets

juniper
junos
21.3, 21.4, 22.1, 22.2 · ≤ 21.3

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V15.4.3

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation activities can exercise concurrent paths and resource contention to discover deadlock conditions before deployment.

Security engineering principles applied during design can incorporate synchronization ordering, timeouts, and resource hierarchies that structurally avoid deadlock formation.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 partial match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices can include concurrency analysis and lock discipline to avoid deadlock conditions.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development can detect deadlock conditions through stress and concurrency testing.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle requires deadlock analysis and avoidance techniques during design and coding.

prevents

Secure system architecture principles include concurrency controls and resource-locking discipline that prevent deadlock.

prevents

Secure coding standards mandate safe lock ordering, timeouts, and deadlock detection patterns.

none

Change management may catch deadlock-related defects during reviews but does not directly address concurrency design.

References