Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-47948

Path Traversal in Jetbrains Teamcity ≤ 2024.07.3

Published
08 October 2024
Modified
11 October 2024
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 4.9
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0053 42th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-47948 is a medium-severity Relative Path Traversal (CWE-23) vulnerability in Jetbrains Teamcity. Its CVSS base score is 4.9 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked at the 42th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

In JetBrains TeamCity before 2024.07.3 path traversal leading to information disclosure was possible via server backups

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-27199Same product: Jetbrains Teamcity
CVE-2024-36362Same product: Jetbrains Teamcity
CVE-2024-47949Same product: Jetbrains Teamcity
CVE-2024-24938Same product: Jetbrains Teamcity
CVE-2025-46433Same product: Jetbrains Teamcity
CVE-2024-24942Same product: Jetbrains Teamcity
CVE-2025-54531Same product: Jetbrains Teamcity
CVE-2025-59456Same product: Jetbrains Teamcity
CVE-2025-67742Same product: Jetbrains Teamcity
CVE-2024-54154Same vendor: Jetbrains

Affected Assets

jetbrains
teamcity
≤ 2024.07.3

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V5.3.2

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-22

Validates pathnames and filenames to prevent traversal outside intended directories.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and path sanitization that prevent relative traversal.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Patching/maintenance can remediate known path-traversal flaws in deployed software (partial prevention of exploitability) but does nothing to stop the coding defect from being introduced in the first place.

PR.AA-05 none match
prevents

PR.AA-05 defines and reviews access policies but does not address code-level pathname neutralization, so neither direction prevents CWE-22.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

detects

Security testing in development catches path traversal via static/dynamic analysis, but does not itself implement the fix.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle mandates input validation and path-handling controls that directly prevent relative path traversal.

prevents

Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against path traversal and other injection flaws.

prevents

Secure architecture principles include directory isolation and canonicalization, reducing but not eliminating traversal risk.

prevents

Secure coding standards require neutralizing path traversal sequences, directly addressing CWE-23.

mitigates

Information access restriction limits which files can be reached, mitigating impact but not preventing the traversal flaw.

References