Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:LSummary
CVE-2024-4853 is a low-severity Mismatched Memory Management Routines (CWE-762) vulnerability in Wireshark Wireshark. Its CVSS base score is 3.6 (Low).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 35th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2024-44431
Vulnerability Data
Memory handling issue in editcap could cause denial of service via crafted capture file
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation can discover mismatched memory calls through static analysis, dynamic testing, or fuzzing.
Documented development standards and tools can enforce or check for correct pairing of allocators and deallocators.
Engineering principles can mandate consistent use of matching allocation and deallocation routines during design and implementation.
Input validation can structurally reject or sanitize data that would otherwise trigger an out-of-bounds write.
Memory-protection mechanisms limit the exploitability and blast radius of a successful out-of-bounds write.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly prevent mismatched alloc/free via code review and static analysis, but fixing this single CWE only partially fulfills the broad control.
Vulnerability scanning and recording can discover out-of-bounds write flaws so they can be remediated.
Patching or replacing vulnerable software directly eliminates known instances of this coding weakness.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development can detect mismatched alloc/free pairs before release.
Secure development lifecycle mandates consistent allocation/deallocation patterns that prevent mismatched memory routines.
Application security requirements can specify bounds-checking and safe memory handling.
Secure system architecture and engineering principles require use of matching allocators and deallocators.
Secure coding standards directly prohibit mismatched memory-management calls and enforce safe patterns.
Change management can enforce review gates that catch unsafe memory operations before deployment.