Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XSummary
CVE-2024-50559 is a medium-severity Path Traversal (CWE-22) vulnerability in Siemens Ruggedcom Rm1224 Lte\(4G\) Eu Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 5.1 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 18th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2024-44950
Vulnerability Data
A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM RM1224 LTE(4G) EU (6GK6108-4AM00-2BA2) (All versions < V8.2), RUGGEDCOM RM1224 LTE(4G) NAM (6GK6108-4AM00-2DA2) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE M804PB (6GK5804-0AP00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE M812-1 ADSL-Router (6GK5812-1AA00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE…
more
M812-1 ADSL-Router (6GK5812-1BA00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE M816-1 ADSL-Router (6GK5816-1AA00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE M816-1 ADSL-Router (6GK5816-1BA00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE M826-2 SHDSL-Router (6GK5826-2AB00-2AB2) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE M874-2 (6GK5874-2AA00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE M874-3 (6GK5874-3AA00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE M874-3 3G-Router (CN) (6GK5874-3AA00-2FA2) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE M876-3 (6GK5876-3AA02-2BA2) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE M876-3 (ROK) (6GK5876-3AA02-2EA2) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE M876-4 (6GK5876-4AA10-2BA2) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE M876-4 (EU) (6GK5876-4AA00-2BA2) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE M876-4 (NAM) (6GK5876-4AA00-2DA2) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE MUM853-1 (A1) (6GK5853-2EA10-2AA1) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE MUM853-1 (B1) (6GK5853-2EA10-2BA1) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE MUM853-1 (EU) (6GK5853-2EA00-2DA1) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (A1) (6GK5856-2EA10-3AA1) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (B1) (6GK5856-2EA10-3BA1) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (CN) (6GK5856-2EA00-3FA1) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (EU) (6GK5856-2EA00-3DA1) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (RoW) (6GK5856-2EA00-3AA1) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE S615 EEC LAN-Router (6GK5615-0AA01-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2), SCALANCE S615 LAN-Router (6GK5615-0AA00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2). Affected devices do not properly validate the filenames of the certificate. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to append arbitrary values which will lead to compromise of integrity of the system.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V5.3.2
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Enforces the intended directory access authorizations that path traversal would otherwise bypass.
Input validation directly neutralizes special path elements before pathname construction occurs.
Least privilege reduces the impact of any unauthorized file access obtained via traversal.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Patching/maintenance can remediate known path-traversal flaws in deployed software (partial prevention of exploitability) but does nothing to stop the coding defect from being introduced in the first place.
PR.AA-05 defines and reviews access policies but does not address code-level pathname neutralization, so neither direction prevents CWE-22.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development catches path traversal via static/dynamic analysis.
Secure SDLC mandates input validation and path sanitization that directly prevent path traversal.
Application security requirements include rules for safe file handling and canonicalization.
Secure architecture principles require least-privilege file access and directory isolation.
Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe path construction and mandate safe APIs.
Information access restriction limits which files an application may read or write.