Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-50954

Published
15 January 2025
Modified
15 April 2026
CVSS Score v3.1 7.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0043 35th percentile
Risk Priority 57 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2024-50954 is a high-severity Improper Check or Handling of Exceptional Conditions (CWE-703) vulnerability. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499); ranked at the 35th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SC-24 (Fail in Known State) and SI-17 (Fail-safe Procedures) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2024-50954 is a vulnerability in the Modbus message handling of XINJE XL5E-16T and XD5E-24R-E programmable logic controllers (PLCs) running firmware versions V3.5.3b through V3.7.2a. When a TCP connection is established with these controllers over a local area network (LAN), sending a specific Modbus message triggers an improper check or handling of exceptional conditions (CWE-703), causing the PLC to crash. This interrupts normal program operation, activates the ERR indicator light, and deactivates the RUN indicator light. The vulnerability has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).

Any unauthenticated attacker with network access to the affected PLC can exploit this issue by establishing a TCP connection and transmitting the crafted Modbus message. Exploitation requires low complexity and no privileges, enabling remote denial-of-service (DoS) attacks that halt PLC functionality and disrupt connected industrial processes.

Further technical details, including reproduction steps for the vulnerability, are documented in the advisory at https://github.com/Curator-Kim/Vulnerability-mining/blob/master/XINJE%20XL5E-16T%20XD5E-24R%20Modbus/XINJE%20XL5E-16T%20XD5E-24R%20Modbus.md. No patch or mitigation guidance is specified in available sources.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

The XINJE XL5E-16T and XD5E-24R-E programmable logic controllers V3.5.3b-V3.7.2a have a vulnerability in handling Modbus messages. When a TCP connection is established with the above series of controllers within a local area network (LAN), sending a specific Modbus message to…

more

the controller can cause the PLC to crash, interrupting the normal operation of the programs running in the PLC. This results in the ERR indicator light turning on and the RUN indicator light turning off.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1499 Endpoint Denial of Service Impact
Adversaries may perform Endpoint Denial of Service (DoS) attacks to degrade or block the availability of services to users.
T1499.004 Application or System Exploitation Impact
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities that can cause an application or system to crash and deny availability to users.
T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-28959Shared CWE-703
CVE-2025-3084Shared CWE-703
CVE-2022-22265Shared CWE-703
CVE-2023-35867Shared CWE-703
CVE-2024-21593Shared CWE-703
CVE-2024-51491Shared CWE-703
CVE-2023-32230Shared CWE-703
CVE-2025-13021Shared CWE-703
CVE-2023-5563Shared CWE-703
CVE-2024-39514Shared CWE-703

Affected Assets

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Enforces failure to a known state while preserving required properties, limiting impact of unhandled exceptions.

Mandates explicit fail-safe procedures triggered by indicated failures, structurally preventing unhandled exceptional conditions.

Requires application of security engineering principles that include robust exception and error handling during design.

Requires generation of safe, actionable error messages that directly addresses proper handling of exceptional conditions.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices explicitly require anticipating and correctly handling exceptional conditions during design and coding.

References