CVE-2024-51727
Ruijienetworks Reyee Os 2.206.0 – 2.320.0
Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XSummary
CVE-2024-51727 is a high-severity Premature Release of Resource During Expected Lifetime (CWE-826) vulnerability in Ruijienetworks Reyee Os. Its CVSS base score is 7.1 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 41th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-8 (Security and Privacy Engineering Principles) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2024-45761
Vulnerability Data
Ruijie Reyee OS versions 2.206.x up to but not including 2.320.x contains a feature that could enable attackers to invalidate a legitimate user's session and cause a denial-of-service attack on a user's account.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation can discover premature-release defects before deployment.
Engineering principles can require correct resource lifetime management so the premature-release pattern is never coded.
Process isolation confines the blast radius when a resource is released while still referenced inside another domain.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing can detect premature-release bugs, providing partial mitigation.
Secure development lifecycle practices can include resource-lifetime checks that reduce premature-release defects.
Application security requirements can mandate explicit resource-release rules, partially addressing the weakness.
Secure architecture principles encourage proper resource scoping and lifetime management.
Secure coding standards directly prohibit premature resource release, covering most of the weakness.
Change-management processes may catch resource-handling regressions but do not directly prevent the weakness.