Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-52325

Command Injection in Ecovacs Goat G1-2000 Firmware ≤ 1.36.187

Public PoCCommand Injection
Published
23 January 2025
Modified
23 September 2025
Patch / advisory
View advisory
CVSS Score v4 5.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.030 86th percentile
Risk Priority 39 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-52325 is a medium-severity Command Injection (CWE-77) vulnerability in Ecovacs Goat G1-2000 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 5.8 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked in the top 14% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2024-52325 is a command injection vulnerability (CWE-77) affecting ECOVACS robot lawnmowers and vacuums. The issue resides in the SetNetPin() function, which is exposed over an unauthenticated Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) connection. It carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.6 (AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

An attacker in adjacent physical proximity, within BLE range, can exploit the vulnerability with low attack complexity, no required privileges, and no user interaction. Exploitation enables command injection, achieving high impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability across a changed scope, potentially allowing full device compromise.

ECOVACS has issued security advisories DSA-2024-11-19 and DSA-2024-11-30-001 detailing mitigations, available at their user help portal. Further technical analysis appears in a DEFCON 32 presentation on reverse engineering and hacking ECOVACS robots, including a related YouTube recording.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

A05:2025 Injection

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

ECOVACS robot lawnmowers and vacuums are vulnerable to command injection via SetNetPin() over an unauthenticated BLE connection.

CWE(s)
CWE-77

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1059 Command and Scripting Interpreter Execution
Adversaries may abuse command and script interpreters to execute commands, scripts, or binaries.
attack.mitre.org →
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
attack.mitre.org →
T1059.001 PowerShell Execution
Adversaries may abuse PowerShell commands and scripts for execution.
attack.mitre.org →
T1059.003 Windows Command Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse the Windows command shell for execution.
attack.mitre.org →
T1059.004 Unix Shell Execution
Adversaries may abuse Unix shell commands and scripts for execution.
attack.mitre.org →
T1059.008 Network Device CLI Execution
Adversaries may abuse scripting or built-in command line interpreters (CLI) on network devices to execute malicious command and payloads.
attack.mitre.org →
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-53672Shared CWE-77
CVE-2024-38228Shared CWE-77
CVE-2023-1389Shared CWE-77
CVE-2023-46409Shared CWE-77
CVE-2023-37469Shared CWE-77
CVE-2026-35847Shared CWE-77
CVE-2023-48801Shared CWE-77
CVE-2024-30637Shared CWE-77
CVE-2023-37567Shared CWE-77
CVE-2025-4089Shared CWE-77

Affected Assets

ecovacs
goat g1-2000 firmware
≤ 1.36.187
ecovacs
goat g1 firmware
≤ 1.36.187
ecovacs
goat g1-800 firmware
≤ 1.36.187
ecovacs
gx-600 firmware
≤ 1.2.120
ecovacs
deebot x2 omni firmware
≤ 1.76.6
ecovacs
deebot x2 combo firmware
≤ 1.81.10
ecovacs
deebot x2s firmware
≤ 1.49.0
ecovacs
deebot x5 pro firmware
≤ 1.70.0
ecovacs
deebot x5 pro plus firmware
≤ 1.38.0
ecovacs
deebot x5 pro ultra firmware
≤ 1.17.0
+2 more product configuration(s) — see NVD for full list

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.3
  • V1.2.5
  • V1.2.8
  • V1.2.9

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

SA-11 Developer Testing and Evaluation good match

Developer testing and evaluation can discover command-construction flaws before deployment.

SI-10 Information Input Validation good match

Input validation directly stops construction of commands from untrusted data containing special elements.

SA-8 Security and Privacy Engineering Principles partial match

Secure engineering principles include proper neutralization and safe command construction practices.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and neutralization that prevent command injection.

DE.CM-09 partial match
prevents

Runtime monitoring of software and data can detect anomalous command execution resulting from injection.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Identifying recorded vulnerabilities enables remediation of command-injection flaws before exploitation.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.8.28 Secure coding mostly match
prevents

Secure coding standards require proper escaping and parameterization of commands, directly eliminating CWE-77.

A.8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance mostly match
finds

Security testing in development catches command-injection vulnerabilities before release.

A.8.25 Secure development life cycle partial match
prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and command construction practices that directly prevent command injection.

A.8.26 Application security requirements partial match
prevents

Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection flaws including command injection.

A.8.27 Secure system architecture and engineering principles partial match
prevents

Secure architecture principles reduce the attack surface but do not prescribe the specific neutralization techniques needed.

A.8.31 Separation of development, test and production environments none match
none

Environment separation limits the blast radius of an exploited command injection but does not prevent the flaw itself.

References