Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-54129

Published
05 December 2024
Modified
15 April 2026
CVSS Score v4 9.2
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0042 35th percentile
Risk Priority 45 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2024-54129 is a critical-severity Improper Initialization (CWE-665) vulnerability. Its CVSS base score is 9.2 (Critical).

Operationally, ranked at the 35th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-8 (Security and Privacy Engineering Principles) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

The NASA’s Interplanetary Overlay Network (ION) is an implementation of Delay/Disruption Tolerant Networking (DTN). A vulnerability exists in the version ION-DTN BPv7 implementation version 4.1.3 when receiving a bundle with an improper reference to the imc scheme with valid Service-Specific…

more

Part (SSP) in their Previous Node Block. The vulnerability can cause ION to become unresponsive. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.1.3s.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-31157Shared CWE-665
CVE-2023-37479Shared CWE-665
CVE-2023-52452Shared CWE-665
CVE-2024-36331Shared CWE-665
CVE-2023-35061Shared CWE-665
CVE-2026-26958Shared CWE-665
CVE-2025-48509Shared CWE-665
CVE-2025-22834Shared CWE-665
CVE-2023-20591Shared CWE-665
CVE-2023-1048Shared CWE-665

Affected Assets

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation directly exercises initialization paths and can reveal missing or incorrect resource setup.

Engineering principles applied during design and implementation can require explicit initialization to a known state.

Requiring the system to fail to a known state structurally reduces the chance that uninitialized resources remain reachable.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly enforce proper resource initialization during coding and testing.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect uninitialized variables but does not itself enforce initialization practices.

prevents

Configuration management can enforce secure defaults and initialization settings but is not the primary control for code-level initialization.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates initialization checks and secure defaults that directly prevent improper resource initialization.

prevents

Secure system architecture and engineering principles require explicit initialization of resources and secure state management.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly forbid uninitialized variables and mandate proper resource initialization before use.

References