Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:NSummary
CVE-2024-54523 is a medium-severity Out-of-bounds Write (CWE-787) vulnerability in Apple Ipados. Its CVSS base score is 6.3 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 36th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2024-54523 is a vulnerability addressed through improved bounds checks, classified under CWE-787 (Out-of-bounds Write). It affects Apple operating systems prior to the following versions: iOS 18.2, iPadOS 18.2, macOS Sequoia 15.2, tvOS 18.2, and watchOS 11.2. The flaw allows an app to corrupt coprocessor memory, with a CVSS v3.1 base score of 6.3 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N).
A local attacker with no privileges required can exploit this vulnerability by tricking a user into interacting with a malicious app, such as through social engineering to install or execute it. Successful exploitation enables high integrity impact by corrupting coprocessor memory, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution or other system disruptions within the changed scope, though it does not directly affect confidentiality or availability.
Apple security advisories, detailed in support documents such as https://support.apple.com/en-us/121837, https://support.apple.com/en-us/121839, https://support.apple.com/en-us/121843, and https://support.apple.com/en-us/121844, confirm the issue was fixed via improved bounds checks in the listed software updates. Mitigation requires applying these patches promptly to vulnerable systems.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2024-52620
Vulnerability Data
The issue was addressed with improved bounds checks. This issue is fixed in iOS 18.2 and iPadOS 18.2, macOS Sequoia 15.2, tvOS 18.2, watchOS 11.2. An app may be able to corrupt coprocessor memory.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation (including fuzzing and bounds checks) finds out-of-bounds write flaws before deployment.
Requiring documented secure-development standards and tools can mandate bounds-checked coding practices that avoid the weakness.
Input validation can structurally reject or sanitize data that would otherwise trigger an out-of-bounds write.
Memory-protection mechanisms limit the exploitability and blast radius of a successful out-of-bounds write.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure-development practices (static analysis, bounds checking, code review) are the primary means of preventing out-of-bounds writes.
Vulnerability scanning and recording can discover out-of-bounds write flaws so they can be remediated.
Patching or replacing vulnerable software directly eliminates known instances of this coding weakness.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development and acceptance can detect and prevent out-of-bounds write defects.
Secure development life cycle mandates practices that prevent out-of-bounds writes.
Application security requirements can specify bounds-checking and safe memory handling.
Secure architecture and engineering principles reduce the likelihood of buffer overflows.
Secure coding directly addresses out-of-bounds writes through language choice and coding standards.
Change management can enforce review gates that catch unsafe memory operations before deployment.