Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-55628

DoS in Oisf Suricata ≤ 7.0.8

Published
06 January 2025
Modified
31 March 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0069 50th percentile
Risk Priority 58 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-55628 is a high-severity Amplification (CWE-405) vulnerability in Oisf Suricata. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Network Denial of Service (T1498); ranked at the 50th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AU-2 (Event Logging) and AU-7 (Audit Record Reduction and Report Generation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2024-55628 affects Suricata, an open-source network Intrusion Detection System (IDS), Intrusion Prevention System (IPS), and Network Security Monitoring (NSM) engine. In versions prior to 7.0.8, the vulnerability stems from improper handling of DNS resource name compression, where small DNS messages can encode very large hostnames. This results in excessive computational costs during decoding and the generation of oversized DNS log records. Existing limits on hostname lengths were deemed too permissive, earning a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H) and mapping to CWE-405 (Asymmetric Resource Consumption), CWE-779 (Logging of Excessive Data), and NVD-CWE-Other.

A remote, unauthenticated attacker can exploit this flaw by sending specially crafted DNS packets over the network. The decompression process consumes disproportionate resources, potentially leading to denial-of-service conditions through CPU exhaustion or disk space depletion from massive log entries. No user interaction or privileges are required, making it feasible against internet-exposed Suricata deployments performing DNS inspection.

The issue was addressed in Suricata version 7.0.8 via targeted commits tightening hostname length limits and improving decompression bounds. Official advisories, including GHSA-96w4-jqwf-qx2j on GitHub and Open Information Security Foundation's Redmine ticket #7280, recommend upgrading to 7.0.8 or later. Relevant patches are available in commits such as 19cf0f81335d9f787d587450f7105ad95a648951, 37f4c52b22fcdde4adf9b479cb5700f89d00768d, and 3a5671739f5b25e5dd973a74ca5fd8ea40e1ae2d.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Suricata is a network Intrusion Detection System, Intrusion Prevention System and Network Security Monitoring engine. Prior to version 7.0.8, DNS resource name compression can lead to small DNS messages containing very large hostnames which can be costly to decode, and…

more

lead to very large DNS log records. While there are limits in place, they were too generous. The issue has been addressed in Suricata 7.0.8.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1498 Network Denial of Service Impact
Adversaries may perform Network Denial of Service (DoS) attacks to degrade or block the availability of targeted resources to users.
T1499.002 Service Exhaustion Flood Impact
Adversaries may target the different network services provided by systems to conduct a denial of service (DoS).
T1499.003 Application Exhaustion Flood Impact
Adversaries may target resource intensive features of applications to cause a denial of service (DoS), denying availability to those applications.
T1498.002 Reflection Amplification Impact
Adversaries may attempt to cause a denial of service (DoS) by reflecting a high-volume of network traffic to a target.
T1499 Endpoint Denial of Service Impact
Adversaries may perform Endpoint Denial of Service (DoS) attacks to degrade or block the availability of services to users.
T1499.001 OS Exhaustion Flood Impact
Adversaries may launch a denial of service (DoS) attack targeting an endpoint's operating system (OS).
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-38534Same product: Oisf Suricata
CVE-2024-28870Same product: Oisf Suricata
CVE-2025-29916Same product: Oisf Suricata
CVE-2026-22259Same product: Oisf Suricata
CVE-2024-32663Same product: Oisf Suricata
CVE-2025-29917Same product: Oisf Suricata
CVE-2025-53538Same product: Oisf Suricata
CVE-2026-31935Same product: Oisf Suricata
CVE-2026-22258Same product: Oisf Suricata
CVE-2024-38535Same product: Oisf Suricata

Affected Assets

oisf
suricata
≤ 7.0.8

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 6 hardening rules · 3 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Defining the exact event types to be logged prevents indiscriminate collection of excessive data.

Audit-record reduction and on-demand reporting directly reduce the impact of overly verbose logs during review.

SC-5 directly requires mechanisms to limit the effects of asymmetric resource exhaustion attacks such as amplification DoS.

SC-6 enforces resource quotas and priority allocation that reduce the impact of unauthenticated or low-effort resource requests.

Least-functionality disables unnecessary services or features that could be leveraged for amplification.

SC-7 boundary controls can filter or rate-limit traffic patterns that enable amplification without equivalent client work.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

DE.AE-04 mostly match
degrades

Excessive logging hinders log processing and forensic analysis, largely undermining DE.AE-04's ability to estimate impact/scope via SIEMs or tools while removing most of that outcome's efficacy.

PR.IR-03 mostly match
prevents

Resilience mechanisms such as rate limiting and load balancing directly constrain asymmetric resource use.

PR.IR-04 mostly match
prevents

Capacity planning and monitoring maintain availability headroom against amplification attacks.

DE.AE-02 partial match
degrades

Excessive logging undermines event analysis by flooding logs with noise that hinders processing and forensic review, but does not blind or defeat the outcome the way insufficient logging would.

DE.AE-06 partial match
degrades

Excessive logging impairs processing of provided event data and log-analysis findings (one aspect of DE.AE-06) without fully defeating alert/ticket distribution.

DE.CM-01 partial match
prevents

Network monitoring detects amplification traffic patterns but does not itself limit asymmetric consumption.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.8.15 Logging mostly match
prevents

A.8.15 directly requires logging to be configured so that only necessary events are recorded, preventing excessive data.

prevents

Documented operating procedures can include logging guidelines, indirectly reducing excessive logging.

prevents

Monitoring activities can detect excessive logging but do not prescribe how much data should be logged.

mitigates

Stress-testing and demand-reduction tactics (e.g., bandwidth throttling) blunt amplification vectors that would otherwise let an attacker multiply resource consumption through a single request.

Hardening callouts derived

Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (authoritative rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).

Oracle Linux 8 (2 rules)
  • V-248553 OL 8 must be configured so that all network connections associated with SSH traffic are terminated after 10 minutes of becoming unresponsive. prevents CWE-405
  • V-248552 OL 8 must be configured so that all network connections associated with SSH traffic terminate after becoming unresponsive. prevents CWE-405
Oracle Linux 9 (2 rules)
  • V-271709 OL 9 must be configured so that all network connections associated with SSH traffic terminate after becoming unresponsive. prevents CWE-405
  • V-271710 OL 9 must be configured so that all network connections associated with SSH traffic are terminated after 10 minutes of becoming unresponsive. prevents CWE-405
RHEL 8 (2 rules)
  • V-230244 RHEL 8 must be configured so that all network connections associated with SSH traffic terminate after becoming unresponsive. prevents CWE-405
  • V-244525 RHEL 8 must be configured so that all network connections associated with SSH traffic are terminated after 10 minutes of becoming unresponsive. prevents CWE-405

References