Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-31932

DoS in Oisf Suricata ≤ 7.0.15

Published
02 April 2026
Modified
07 April 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0027 19th percentile
Risk Priority 56 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-31932 is a high-severity Inefficient Algorithmic Complexity (CWE-407) vulnerability in Oisf Suricata. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Endpoint Denial of Service (T1499); ranked at the 19th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SC-5 (Denial-of-service Protection) and SC-6 (Resource Availability) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-31932 affects Suricata, an open-source network intrusion detection system (IDS), intrusion prevention system (IPS), and network security monitoring (NSM) engine. The vulnerability stems from an inefficiency in KRB5 buffering that causes performance degradation. It impacts versions of Suricata prior to 7.0.15 and 8.0.4, and has been assigned CWE-407 (incomplete cleanup) with a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).

The vulnerability can be exploited remotely over the network by unauthenticated attackers with low complexity and no user interaction required. By sending crafted traffic that triggers the inefficient KRB5 buffering, attackers can induce significant performance degradation, leading to high availability impact such as denial-of-service on the affected Suricata instance. There is no impact on confidentiality or integrity.

Advisories recommend upgrading to Suricata versions 7.0.15 or 8.0.4, where the issue has been patched. Detailed information is available in the GitHub Security Advisory at https://github.com/OISF/suricata/security/advisories/GHSA-rp9m-jcpw-hggr and the Open Information Security Foundation Redmine issue at https://redmine.openinfosecfoundation.org/issues/8305.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine. Prior to versions 7.0.15 and 8.0.4, inefficiency in KRB5 buffering can lead to performance degradation. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.15 and 8.0.4.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1499 Endpoint Denial of Service Impact
Adversaries may perform Endpoint Denial of Service (DoS) attacks to degrade or block the availability of services to users.
T1499.003 Application Exhaustion Flood Impact
Adversaries may target resource intensive features of applications to cause a denial of service (DoS), denying availability to those applications.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-31933Same product: Oisf Suricata
CVE-2026-31937Same product: Oisf Suricata
CVE-2026-31934Same product: Oisf Suricata
CVE-2025-29918Same product: Oisf Suricata
CVE-2026-22261Same product: Oisf Suricata
CVE-2026-22263Same product: Oisf Suricata
CVE-2024-55605Same product: Oisf Suricata
CVE-2024-45795Same product: Oisf Suricata
CVE-2024-47522Same product: Oisf Suricata
CVE-2024-55628Same product: Oisf Suricata

Affected Assets

oisf
suricata
≤ 7.0.15 · 8.0.0 — 8.0.4

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.2.9

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Denial-of-service protection directly reduces the impact of resource exhaustion triggered by worst-case algorithmic inputs.

Resource availability allocation limits blast radius when an inefficient algorithm is forced into its worst case.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices (code review, complexity analysis, safe algorithm selection) prevent introduction of exploitable worst-case behavior.

DE.CM-09 partial match
prevents

Runtime monitoring of software and resources can detect the performance impact of triggered worst-case complexity.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Identifying and recording algorithmic-complexity vulnerabilities directly addresses the root cause before exploitation.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can uncover performance issues stemming from algorithmic complexity.

mitigates

Redundancy of processing facilities can absorb resource exhaustion from inefficient algorithms.

finds

Monitoring activities can identify anomalous resource consumption indicative of algorithmic complexity attacks.

prevents

Secure development life cycle includes design reviews that can catch inefficient algorithms before deployment.

prevents

Secure system architecture principles encourage selection of algorithms with acceptable worst-case complexity.

prevents

Secure coding practices can include guidelines to avoid or mitigate inefficient algorithms.

References