Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:HSummary
CVE-2024-56451 is a high-severity Integer Overflow to Buffer Overflow (CWE-680) vulnerability in Huawei Harmonyos. Its CVSS base score is 7.3 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 1th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2024-56451 is an integer overflow vulnerability (CWE-190, CWE-680) during glTF model loading in the 3D engine module of Huawei software. Published on January 8, 2025, it carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.3 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:H), rated as high severity.
A local attacker with low privileges can exploit this vulnerability with low attack complexity and no user interaction required. Successful exploitation may lead to high confidentiality impact through unauthorized access to sensitive data, low integrity impact, and high availability impact such as denial of service.
Huawei has issued a security bulletin detailing mitigations and patches for this vulnerability, available at https://consumer.huawei.com/en/support/bulletin/2025/1/.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2024-53160
Vulnerability Data
Integer overflow vulnerability during glTF model loading in the 3D engine module Impact: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may affect availability.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V5.2.6
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and analysis (static, dynamic, fuzzing) finds integer-overflow-to-allocation defects before deployment.
Mandates documented development standards and tools that enforce secure coding rules against unsafe integer arithmetic.
Requires engineering principles such as safe arithmetic and bounds-checked allocation that directly stop integer overflow during memory-size computation.
Validates untrusted size/offset inputs before they reach allocation calculations, structurally blocking the integer overflow path.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices directly prevent integer-overflow flaws during development, but eliminating only this CWE covers only part of the broad control intent.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing can detect integer-overflow-to-buffer-overflow conditions during development.
Secure development life cycle mandates practices that can catch integer overflows before deployment.
Application security requirements can specify safe integer handling and bounds checking.
Secure architecture principles encourage use of safe arithmetic libraries and overflow detection.
Secure coding standards directly require prevention of integer overflows that lead to buffer overflows.