Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-6425

Mesbook 20221021.03

Published
01 July 2024
Modified
22 October 2025
CVSS Score v3.1 9.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0054 43th percentile
Risk Priority 67 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-6425 is a critical-severity Incorrect Provision of Specified Functionality (CWE-684) vulnerability in Mesbook Mesbook. Its CVSS base score is 9.1 (Critical).

Operationally, ranked at the 43th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Incorrect Provision of Specified Functionality vulnerability in MESbook 20221021.03 version. An unauthenticated remote attacker can register user accounts without being authenticated from the route "/account/Register/" and in the parameters "UserName=<RANDOMUSER>&Password=<PASSWORD>&ConfirmPassword=<PASSWORD-REPEAT>".

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-6427Same product: Mesbook Mesbook
CVE-2024-6426Same product: Mesbook Mesbook
CVE-2024-6424Same product: Mesbook Mesbook
CVE-2023-24845Shared CWE-684
CVE-2025-55174Shared CWE-684
CVE-2025-54568Shared CWE-684
CVE-2025-58325Shared CWE-684
CVE-2026-44597Shared CWE-684
CVE-2025-47227Shared CWE-684
CVE-2024-5005Shared CWE-684

Affected Assets

mesbook
mesbook
20221021.03

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 1 hardening rule · 1 OS baseline
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation activities are performed precisely to discover when delivered functionality fails to match published specifications.

Requiring a documented development process and supporting tools reduces the chance that specified functionality will be implemented incorrectly.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly enforce spec-compliant functionality and testing, while eliminating this weakness fulfills only part of the control's broader monitoring intent.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development and acceptance validates that implemented functionality conforms to specifications before release.

prevents

Secure development life cycle includes requirements and verification activities that directly reduce the risk of delivering functionality that deviates from published specifications.

prevents

Explicit application security requirements and acceptance criteria help ensure the delivered software matches its intended specifications.

prevents

Change management processes reduce the chance of unintended functional deviations during updates, though they do not directly address initial specification conformance.

Hardening callouts derived

Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (authoritative rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).

RHEL 9 (1 rule)
  • V-258078 RHEL 9 must use a Linux Security Module configured to enforce limits on system services. prevents CWE-684

References