Security Resilience

CVE-2024-9309

SSRF in Hliu Llava 1.2.0

Public PoCSSRF
Published
20 March 2025
Modified
15 July 2025
CVSS Score v3 9.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0051 43th percentile
Risk Priority 66 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2024-9309 is a critical-severity SSRF (CWE-918) vulnerability in Hliu Llava. Its CVSS base score is 9.3 (Critical).

Operationally, ranked at the 43th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-4 (Information Flow Enforcement) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the POST /worker_generate_stream API endpoint of the Controller API Server in haotian-liu/llava version v1.2.0 (LLaVA-1.6). This vulnerability allows attackers to exploit the victim Controller API Server's credentials to perform unauthorized web actions…

more

or access unauthorized web resources.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-12068Same product: Hliu Llava
CVE-2024-10225Same product: Hliu Llava
CVE-2024-9308Same product: Hliu Llava
CVE-2024-11449Same vendor: Hliu
CVE-2024-12065Same product: Hliu Llava
CVE-2025-53828Shared CWE-918
CVE-2023-34959Shared CWE-918
CVE-2023-24495Shared CWE-918
CVE-2026-64649Shared CWE-918
CVE-2026-109238Shared CWE-918

Affected Assets

hliu
llava
1.2.0

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.3.6
  • V1.5.3
  • V5.3.2
  • V10.4.7

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Information flow enforcement can restrict which destinations the server is allowed to contact on behalf of users.

Input validation directly stops untrusted URLs from being accepted and fetched without destination checks.

Boundary protection limits the network reach of server-initiated requests even if SSRF occurs.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
blocks

Secure development practices directly include input validation and destination allow-listing that prevent SSRF.

DE.CM-09 partial match
blocks

Runtime monitoring of web applications and services can detect anomalous outbound requests indicative of SSRF.

ID.RA-01 partial match
blocks

Vulnerability identification processes can discover and record SSRF flaws in web applications.

PR.IR-01 partial match
blocks

Network segmentation and egress controls can limit the damage from successful SSRF requests.

References