Cyber Resilience

CVE-2024-9820

Dueclic Wp 2Fa With Telegram ≤ 3.1

Published
15 October 2024
Modified
19 October 2024
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 6.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
EPSS Score 0.0040 33th percentile
Risk Priority 50 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2024-9820 is a medium-severity Reliance on Cookies without Validation and Integrity Checking in a Security Decision (CWE-784) vulnerability in Dueclic Wp 2Fa With Telegram. Its CVSS base score is 6.5 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Web Session Cookie (T1550.004); ranked at the 33th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and IA-2 (Identification and Authentication (Organizational Users)) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

The WP 2FA with Telegram plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Two-Factor Authentication Bypass in versions up to, and including, 3.0. This is due to the two-factor code being stored in a cookie, which makes it possible to bypass two-factor…

more

authentication.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1550.004 Web Session Cookie Lateral Movement
Adversaries can use stolen session cookies to authenticate to web applications and services.
T1185 Browser Session Hijacking Collection
Adversaries may take advantage of security vulnerabilities and inherent functionality in browser software to change content, modify user-behaviors, and intercept information as part of various browser session hijacking techniques.
T1539 Steal Web Session Cookie Credential Access
An adversary may steal web application or service session cookies and use them to gain access to web applications or Internet services as an authenticated user without needing credentials.
T1550 Use Alternate Authentication Material Lateral Movement
Adversaries may use alternate authentication material, such as password hashes, Kerberos tickets, and application access tokens, in order to move laterally within an environment and bypass normal system access controls.
T1606 Forge Web Credentials Credential Access
Adversaries may forge credential materials that can be used to gain access to web applications or Internet services.
T1606.001 Web Cookies Credential Access
Adversaries may forge web cookies that can be used to gain access to web applications or Internet services.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-9687Same product: Dueclic Wp 2Fa With Telegram
CVE-2023-3050Shared CWE-565, CWE-784
CVE-2026-60134Shared CWE-784
CVE-2024-21872Shared CWE-565
CVE-2026-5130Shared CWE-565
CVE-2024-9970Shared CWE-565
CVE-2025-31120Shared CWE-565
CVE-2025-2395Shared CWE-565
CVE-2025-48980Shared CWE-565
CVE-2023-41084Shared CWE-565

Affected Assets

dueclic
wp 2fa with telegram
≤ 3.1

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V3.3.1

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Access enforcement requires authorizations to be validated rather than accepted from untrusted cookie values.

Proper user identification and authentication precludes security decisions based solely on unvalidated cookies.

Session authenticity protection directly requires integrity checking of session tokens such as cookies.

Transmission integrity protection stops cookies from being altered in transit and trusted without verification.

Software, Firmware, and Information Integrity can detect unauthorized modification of cookie-based data after the fact via integrity verification.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.AA-04 full match
prevents

Verifying identity assertions explicitly requires integrity and validity checks that eliminate untrusted cookie usage.

PR.AA-03 mostly match
prevents

Strong authentication policies and mechanisms directly prevent reliance on unvalidated cookies for identity decisions.

PR.DS-02 mostly match
prevents

Cryptographic integrity for data-in-transit directly mitigates tampering of cookies sent over the network.

PR.AA-05 partial match
prevents

Enforcing authorization policies ensures access decisions are not based solely on unvalidated client-side cookies.

PR.DS-01 partial match
prevents

Integrity protections for data-at-rest can apply to cookie stores but do not cover validation during use.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect missing cookie validation but does not prevent the weakness by itself.

prevents

Information access restriction requires proper validation of identity tokens before granting access.

prevents

Secure authentication mandates validation of session tokens, directly addressing reliance on unverified cookies.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify cookie validation but do not mandate implementation details.

prevents

Secure coding practices require integrity checks on security-critical cookies used for decisions.

References