CVE-2024-9820
Dueclic Wp 2Fa With Telegram ≤ 3.1
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:NSummary
CVE-2024-9820 is a medium-severity Reliance on Cookies without Validation and Integrity Checking in a Security Decision (CWE-784) vulnerability in Dueclic Wp 2Fa With Telegram. Its CVSS base score is 6.5 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Web Session Cookie (T1550.004); ranked at the 33th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and IA-2 (Identification and Authentication (Organizational Users)) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2024-50142
Vulnerability Data
The WP 2FA with Telegram plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Two-Factor Authentication Bypass in versions up to, and including, 3.0. This is due to the two-factor code being stored in a cookie, which makes it possible to bypass two-factor…
more
authentication.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V3.3.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Access enforcement requires authorizations to be validated rather than accepted from untrusted cookie values.
Proper user identification and authentication precludes security decisions based solely on unvalidated cookies.
Session authenticity protection directly requires integrity checking of session tokens such as cookies.
Transmission integrity protection stops cookies from being altered in transit and trusted without verification.
Software, Firmware, and Information Integrity can detect unauthorized modification of cookie-based data after the fact via integrity verification.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Verifying identity assertions explicitly requires integrity and validity checks that eliminate untrusted cookie usage.
Strong authentication policies and mechanisms directly prevent reliance on unvalidated cookies for identity decisions.
Cryptographic integrity for data-in-transit directly mitigates tampering of cookies sent over the network.
Enforcing authorization policies ensures access decisions are not based solely on unvalidated client-side cookies.
Integrity protections for data-at-rest can apply to cookie stores but do not cover validation during use.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing can detect missing cookie validation but does not prevent the weakness by itself.
Information access restriction requires proper validation of identity tokens before granting access.
Secure authentication mandates validation of session tokens, directly addressing reliance on unverified cookies.
Application security requirements can specify cookie validation but do not mandate implementation details.
Secure coding practices require integrity checks on security-critical cookies used for decisions.