Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-0588

Octopus Server 2020.1.0 – 2024.3.13097

Published
11 February 2025
Modified
02 July 2025
Patch / advisory
View advisory
CVSS Score v4 5.9
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0041 34th percentile
Risk Priority 23 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2025-0588 is a medium-severity HTTP Request/Response Splitting (CWE-113) vulnerability in Octopus Octopus Server. Its CVSS base score is 5.9 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Content Injection (T1659); ranked at the 34th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) and SI-15 (Information Output Filtering) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

A05:2025 Injection

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

In affected versions of Octopus Server it was possible for a user with sufficient access to set custom headers in all server responses. By submitting a specifically crafted referrer header the user could ensure that all subsequent server responses would…

more

return 500 errors rendering the site mostly unusable. The user would be able to subsequently set and unset the referrer header to control the denial of service state with a valid CSRF token whilst new CSRF tokens could not be generated.

CWE(s)
CWE-113

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1659 Content Injection Initial Access
Adversaries may gain access and continuously communicate with victims by injecting malicious content into systems through online network traffic.
attack.mitre.org →
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-0513Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2024-4456Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2024-4811Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2025-0589Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2024-9194Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2024-7998Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2026-0704Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2025-0525Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2023-4509Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2024-1656Same product: Linux Linux Kernel

Affected Assets

octopus
octopus server
2020.1.0 — 2024.3.13097 · 2024.4.401 — 2024.4.7091

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V3.4.2
  • V4.1.3
  • V1.3.6
  • V4.2.3

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

SI-10 Information Input Validation good match

Input validation stops unneutralized CR/LF characters from being accepted and later emitted in HTTP headers.

SI-15 Information Output Filtering good match

Output filtering can neutralize CRLF sequences before they reach HTTP response headers.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require input sanitization and header handling that prevent CRLF injection.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance mostly match
finds

Security testing in development and acceptance can detect CRLF injection flaws before deployment.

A.8.25 Secure development life cycle partial match
prevents

Secure development lifecycle mandates input validation and output encoding that directly prevents CRLF injection into HTTP headers.

A.8.26 Application security requirements partial match
prevents

Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against injection flaws including HTTP header manipulation.

A.8.27 Secure system architecture and engineering principles partial match
prevents

Secure architecture principles reduce the likelihood of header-splitting vulnerabilities through proper component isolation.

A.8.28 Secure coding partial match
prevents

Secure coding standards require neutralization of CRLF sequences before inclusion in HTTP headers.

References