Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-0589

Octopus Server 2020.3.3 – 2024.3.13071

Published
11 February 2025
Modified
02 July 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v4 6.9
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0036 29th percentile
Risk Priority 41 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-0589 is a medium-severity Incorrect Use of Privileged APIs (CWE-648) vulnerability in Octopus Octopus Server. Its CVSS base score is 6.9 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism (T1548); ranked at the 29th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and AC-3 (Access Enforcement) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

In affected versions of Octopus Deploy where customers are using Active Directory for authentication it was possible for an unauthenticated user to make an API request against two endpoints which would retrieve some data from the associated Active Directory. The…

more

requests when crafted correctly would return specific information from user profiles (Email address/UPN and Display name) from one endpoint and group information ( Group ID and Display name) from the other. This vulnerability does not expose data within the Octopus Server product itself.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1548 Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may circumvent mechanisms designed to control privilege elevation to gain higher-level permissions.
T1548.001 Setuid and Setgid Privilege Escalation
An adversary may abuse configurations where an application has the setuid or setgid bits set in order to get code running in a different (and possibly more privileged) user’s context.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-2975Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2024-4811Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2024-7998Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2026-0704Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2023-4509Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2025-0525Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2024-9194Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2024-4456Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2025-0513Same product: Linux Linux Kernel
CVE-2024-1656Same product: Linux Linux Kernel

Affected Assets

octopus
octopus server
2020.3.3 — 2024.3.13071 · 2024.4.401 — 2024.4.7065

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V3.5.2
  • V6.4.6

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation can discover incorrect calls to privileged APIs before deployment.

Enforces authorization checks around privileged operations so that an API requiring elevated rights cannot be reached or misused without proper rights.

Least-privilege assignment directly reduces both the availability of privileged APIs and the blast radius when they are invoked incorrectly.

Security engineering principles include correct use of privileged interfaces and safe invocation patterns that stop the weakness from being introduced.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly enforce correct usage of privileged APIs during development.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect incorrect privileged API calls but does not prevent them at design time.

degrades

Restricting privileged utility programs limits the exposure of privileged APIs to misuse.

degrades

Privileged access rights directly govern the correct use of privileged APIs and reduce misuse.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle includes API usage standards that can prevent incorrect privileged calls.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify correct invocation of privileged APIs.

prevents

Secure architecture principles guide proper privilege separation and API usage.

References