Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-0725

Memory Safety in Netapp Hci Baseboard Management Controller

Public PoCMemory Safety
Published
05 February 2025
Modified
27 June 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
EPSS Score 0.012 66th percentile
Risk Priority 60 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-0725 is a high-severity Classic Buffer Overflow (CWE-120) vulnerability in Netapp Hci Baseboard Management Controller. Its CVSS base score is 7.3 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 34% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2025-0725 is a buffer overflow vulnerability in libcurl triggered during automatic gzip decompression of content-encoded HTTP responses when the CURLOPT_ACCEPT_ENCODING option is used together with zlib 1.2.0.3 or older. The root cause is an attacker-controlled integer overflow that leads to improper memory handling, categorized as CWE-120 and carrying a CVSS 3.1 score of 7.3.

An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit the flaw over the network by returning a malicious HTTP response containing a crafted gzip payload. Successful exploitation can produce limited impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability without requiring user interaction or credentials.

Public advisories and patch information are available at https://curl.se/docs/CVE-2025-0725.html, the corresponding JSON record, the referenced HackerOne report, and oss-security mailing list posts from February 2025.

The EPSS probability rose from a low starting value to a peak of 0.0208 on 2026-02-03 before receding, indicating that exploitation interest increased after disclosure.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

When libcurl is asked to perform automatic gzip decompression of content-encoded HTTP responses with the `CURLOPT_ACCEPT_ENCODING` option, **using zlib 1.2.0.3 or older**, an attacker-controlled integer overflow would make libcurl perform a buffer overflow.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
T1212 Exploitation for Credential Access Credential Access
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to collect credentials.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-52533Same product class: NAS / storage appliance
CVE-2019-12255Same product class: NAS / storage appliance
CVE-2021-3711Same product class: NAS / storage appliance
CVE-2019-12257Same product class: NAS / storage appliance
CVE-2020-8625Same product class: NAS / storage appliance
CVE-2020-11984Same product class: NAS / storage appliance
CVE-2025-52863Same product class: NAS / storage appliance
CVE-2023-45035Same product class: NAS / storage appliance
CVE-2023-45042Same product class: NAS / storage appliance
CVE-2023-45044Same product class: NAS / storage appliance

Affected Assets

netapp
hci baseboard management controller
all versions
netapp
hci h610s firmware
all versions
netapp
hci h610c firmware
all versions
netapp
hci h615c firmware
all versions
netapp
solidfire \& hci management node
all versions
netapp
solidfire \& hci storage node
all versions
haxx
curl
7.10.5 — 8.12.0
haxx
libcurl
7.10.5 — 8.12.0

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V5.2.1

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and analysis can find missing size checks before deployment.

Input validation directly enforces size checks before buffer copies.

Engineering principles require bounds checking and safe buffer handling in design.

Memory protection limits the impact of an overflow once it occurs.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure development practices directly enforce bounds checking and input validation that prevent classic buffer overflows.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability identification processes such as code review or scanning detect classic buffer overflows before exploitation.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Routine patching replaces vulnerable code containing unchecked buffer copies with corrected versions.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Secure coding directly requires bounds-checked memory operations, addressing the root cause of CWE-120.

finds

Security testing in development and acceptance can detect buffer overflows through fuzzing and static analysis, though it does not prevent them at the source.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates processes that can include input validation and bounds checking to prevent buffer overflows.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify input-size validation and safe buffer handling to mitigate classic buffer overflows.

prevents

Secure system architecture and engineering principles promote defensive coding patterns that reduce the likelihood of unchecked buffer copies.

References