CVE-2025-10169
Memory Safety in Utt 1200Gw Firmware ≤ 3.0.0-170831
Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XSummary
CVE-2025-10169 is a high-severity Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer (CWE-119) vulnerability in Utt 1200Gw Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 7.4 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 7% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2025-10169 is a buffer overflow vulnerability (CWE-119, CWE-120) in UTT 1200GW routers running firmware up to version 3.0.0-170831. The flaw affects an unknown functionality within the /goform/ConfigWirelessBase CGI endpoint, where manipulation of the 'ssid' argument triggers the buffer overflow condition.
The vulnerability enables remote exploitation by attackers possessing low privileges (PR:L), with low attack complexity (AC:L) and no requirement for user interaction (UI:N). Successful exploitation can result in high impacts to confidentiality, integrity, and availability (C:H/I:H/A:H), as reflected in its CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.8. A public exploit is available, increasing the risk of active attacks.
VulDB advisories and a GitHub repository document the issue, including details on the endpoint and proof-of-concept exploit. The vendor was contacted early regarding disclosure but provided no response, and no patches or mitigations are available from official sources.
The exploit's public availability indicates it could be readily exploited in the wild against unpatched UTT 1200GW devices.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-27496
Vulnerability Data
A weakness has been identified in UTT 1200GW up to 3.0.0-170831. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /goform/ConfigWirelessBase. This manipulation of the argument ssid causes buffer overflow. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit…
more
has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V17.3.2V5.2.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and analysis can find missing size checks before deployment.
Input validation directly enforces size checks before buffer copies.
Secure engineering principles require memory-safe design and coding that structurally avoids buffer-boundary violations.
Memory protection restricts exploitation impact of buffer overflows without eliminating the underlying coding flaw.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices (bounds checking, safe APIs, reviews) directly prevent this class of flaw.
Vulnerability scanning and code analysis directly surface buffer-boundary flaws.
Receiving and triaging vulnerability disclosures commonly includes buffer-related reports.
Developer training on secure coding reduces introduction of memory-buffer errors.
Patching replaces vulnerable code containing buffer-boundary defects.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding directly requires bounds-checked memory operations, addressing the root cause of CWE-120.
Security testing in development catches out-of-bounds accesses before release, covering most instances of the weakness.
Secure development lifecycle mandates memory-safety practices that directly prevent buffer-boundary violations.
Application security requirements can specify memory-safety rules, but do not prescribe implementation details.
Secure architecture and engineering principles include memory-safe design patterns that mitigate buffer overflows.