Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XSummary
CVE-2025-10815 is a high-severity Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer (CWE-119) vulnerability in Tenda Ac20 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 7.4 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 48% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2025-10815 is a buffer overflow vulnerability affecting Tenda AC20 routers running firmware versions up to 16.03.08.12. The issue resides in the strcpy function within the /goform/SetPptpServerCfg file of the HTTP POST Request Handler component, where manipulation of the startIp argument triggers the overflow. Classified under CWE-119 (Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) and CWE-120 (Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input), it carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), indicating high severity due to its potential for remote exploitation.
Attackers with low privileges (PR:L), such as authenticated users, can exploit this vulnerability remotely over the network without requiring user interaction. By sending a crafted HTTP POST request with a malicious startIp value, they can trigger the buffer overflow, potentially achieving high impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, including arbitrary code execution or denial of service. A public exploit is available, hosted on GitHub at https://github.com/Juana-2u/Tenda-AC20, increasing the risk of widespread abuse.
Advisories from VulDB (https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.325173, https://vuldb.com/?id.325173, https://vuldb.com/?submit.654460) detail the vulnerability and submission process, while the vendor's site (https://www.tenda.com.cn/) provides general support resources. No specific patches or mitigation steps are outlined in the available references, underscoring the need for users to monitor for firmware updates.
The exploit's public availability heightens the likelihood of real-world exploitation against unpatched Tenda AC20 devices, particularly in environments with exposed router management interfaces.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-30473
Vulnerability Data
A vulnerability was identified in Tenda AC20 up to 16.03.08.12. Affected by this issue is the function strcpy of the file /goform/SetPptpServerCfg of the component HTTP POST Request Handler. Such manipulation of the argument startIp leads to buffer overflow. The…
more
attack can be launched remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V17.3.2V5.2.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and analysis can find missing size checks before deployment.
Input validation directly enforces size checks before buffer copies.
Secure engineering principles require memory-safe design and coding that structurally avoids buffer-boundary violations.
Memory protection restricts exploitation impact of buffer overflows without eliminating the underlying coding flaw.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices (bounds checking, safe APIs, reviews) directly prevent this class of flaw.
Vulnerability scanning and code analysis directly surface buffer-boundary flaws.
Receiving and triaging vulnerability disclosures commonly includes buffer-related reports.
Developer training on secure coding reduces introduction of memory-buffer errors.
Patching replaces vulnerable code containing buffer-boundary defects.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding directly requires bounds-checked memory operations, addressing the root cause of CWE-120.
Security testing in development catches out-of-bounds accesses before release, covering most instances of the weakness.
Secure development lifecycle mandates memory-safety practices that directly prevent buffer-boundary violations.
Application security requirements can specify memory-safety rules, but do not prescribe implementation details.
Secure architecture and engineering principles include memory-safe design patterns that mitigate buffer overflows.