Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-12239

Memory Safety in Totolink A3300R Firmware 17.0.0cu.557_b20221024

Public PoCMemory Safety
Published
27 October 2025
Modified
27 October 2025
Patch / advisory
View advisory
CVSS Score v4 7.4
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0077 52th percentile
Risk Priority 38 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-12239 is a high-severity Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer (CWE-119) vulnerability in Totolink A3300R Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 7.4 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 48% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2025-12239 is a buffer overflow vulnerability affecting the TOTOLINK A3300R router running firmware version 17.0.0cu.557_B20221024. The issue resides in the setDdnsCfg function within the /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi file, triggered by specific input manipulation that exceeds buffer boundaries. This flaw is classified under CWE-119 (Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) and CWE-120 (Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input), earning a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), indicating high severity due to its potential for significant impact.

Attackers with low privileges (PR:L) can exploit this vulnerability remotely over the network (AV:N) with low complexity (AC:L) and no user interaction required (UI:N). Successful exploitation grants high levels of confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact (C:H/I:H/A:H), potentially allowing arbitrary code execution, data theft, or device takeover. An exploit is publicly available, as documented in a GitHub repository detailing the vulnerability and proof-of-concept.

Advisories from VulDB (ctiid.329909, id.329909, submit.673721) confirm the remote exploitability and public disclosure, while the manufacturer's site (totolink.net) provides general support resources but no specific patch details in the referenced materials. Security practitioners should isolate affected devices, monitor for anomalous DDNS configuration attempts, and seek firmware updates from TOTOLINK, as the public exploit increases the risk of active exploitation.

The public availability of the exploit on GitHub heightens the urgency for mitigation, marking this as a readily weaponizable flaw in an IoT router commonly deployed in home and small office environments.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A weakness has been identified in TOTOLINK A3300R 17.0.0cu.557_B20221024. The impacted element is the function setDdnsCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi. Executing manipulation can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been made available…

more

to the public and could be exploited.

CWE(s)
CWE-119CWE-120

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
attack.mitre.org →
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
attack.mitre.org →
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
attack.mitre.org →
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
attack.mitre.org →
T1055 Process Injection Stealth
Adversaries may inject code into processes in order to evade process-based defenses as well as possibly elevate privileges.
attack.mitre.org →
T1212 Exploitation for Credential Access Credential Access
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to collect credentials.
attack.mitre.org →
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-12240Same product: Totolink A3300R
CVE-2025-12260Same product: Totolink A3300R
CVE-2025-12258Same product: Totolink A3300R
CVE-2025-12241Same product: Totolink A3300R
CVE-2025-12259Same product: Totolink A3300R
CVE-2024-7331Same product: Totolink A3300R
CVE-2025-6128Same vendor: Totolink
CVE-2025-6147Same vendor: Totolink
CVE-2025-6165Same vendor: Totolink
CVE-2025-5737Same vendor: Totolink

Affected Assets

totolink
a3300r firmware
17.0.0cu.557_b20221024

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

—

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

—

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V17.3.2
  • V5.2.1

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

SA-11 Developer Testing and Evaluation good match

Developer testing and analysis can find missing size checks before deployment.

SI-10 Information Input Validation good match

Input validation directly enforces size checks before buffer copies.

SA-8 Security and Privacy Engineering Principles partial match

Secure engineering principles require memory-safe design and coding that structurally avoids buffer-boundary violations.

SI-16 Memory Protection partial match

Memory protection restricts exploitation impact of buffer overflows without eliminating the underlying coding flaw.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices (bounds checking, safe APIs, reviews) directly prevent this class of flaw.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability scanning and code analysis directly surface buffer-boundary flaws.

ID.RA-08 partial match
prevents

Receiving and triaging vulnerability disclosures commonly includes buffer-related reports.

PR.AT-02 partial match
prevents

Developer training on secure coding reduces introduction of memory-buffer errors.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Patching replaces vulnerable code containing buffer-boundary defects.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.8.28 Secure coding mostly match
prevents

Secure coding directly requires bounds-checked memory operations, addressing the root cause of CWE-120.

A.8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance mostly match
finds

Security testing in development catches out-of-bounds accesses before release, covering most instances of the weakness.

A.8.25 Secure development life cycle partial match
prevents

Secure development lifecycle mandates memory-safety practices that directly prevent buffer-boundary violations.

A.8.26 Application security requirements partial match
prevents

Application security requirements can specify memory-safety rules, but do not prescribe implementation details.

A.8.27 Secure system architecture and engineering principles partial match
prevents

Secure architecture and engineering principles include memory-safe design patterns that mitigate buffer overflows.

References