Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XSummary
CVE-2025-12622 is a high-severity Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer (CWE-119) vulnerability in Tenda Ac10 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 7.4 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 46% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2025-12622 is a buffer overflow vulnerability affecting the Tenda AC10 router running firmware version 16.03.10.13. The flaw exists in the formSysRunCmd function of the /goform/SysRunCmd file, where manipulation of the "getui" argument triggers the buffer overflow. It is classified under CWE-119 and CWE-120, with a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), indicating high severity due to its potential for significant impact.
The vulnerability enables remote exploitation by attackers who possess low privileges, such as authenticated users with network access. Exploitation requires low attack complexity and no user interaction, allowing adversaries to achieve high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts. This could result in arbitrary code execution, data leakage, system modification, or denial of service on the affected device.
Advisories detailing the issue are available from VulDB at https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.330914, https://vuldb.com/?id.330914, and https://vuldb.com/?submit.678889, along with a proof-of-concept at https://pan.baidu.com/s/1Jl1zy5niigg1XYm8ZCh_Lg and the vendor site at https://www.tenda.com.cn/. The CVE description notes that the exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized.
The vulnerability was published on 2025-11-03, highlighting the need for immediate firmware updates or network segmentation for exposed Tenda AC10 devices.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-37475
Vulnerability Data
A vulnerability was determined in Tenda AC10 16.03.10.13. Affected by this vulnerability is the function formSysRunCmd of the file /goform/SysRunCmd. This manipulation of the argument getui causes buffer overflow. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been publicly…
more
disclosed and may be utilized.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V17.3.2V5.2.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and analysis can find missing size checks before deployment.
Input validation directly enforces size checks before buffer copies.
Secure engineering principles require memory-safe design and coding that structurally avoids buffer-boundary violations.
Memory protection restricts exploitation impact of buffer overflows without eliminating the underlying coding flaw.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices (bounds checking, safe APIs, reviews) directly prevent this class of flaw.
Vulnerability scanning and code analysis directly surface buffer-boundary flaws.
Receiving and triaging vulnerability disclosures commonly includes buffer-related reports.
Developer training on secure coding reduces introduction of memory-buffer errors.
Patching replaces vulnerable code containing buffer-boundary defects.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding directly requires bounds-checked memory operations, addressing the root cause of CWE-120.
Security testing in development catches out-of-bounds accesses before release, covering most instances of the weakness.
Secure development lifecycle mandates memory-safety practices that directly prevent buffer-boundary violations.
Application security requirements can specify memory-safety rules, but do not prescribe implementation details.
Secure architecture and engineering principles include memory-safe design patterns that mitigate buffer overflows.