Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XSummary
CVE-2025-13305 is a high-severity Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer (CWE-119) vulnerability in Dlink Dir-825M Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 7.4 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 12% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2025-13305 is a buffer overflow vulnerability (CWE-119, CWE-120) identified in D-Link routers, specifically models DWR-M920, DWR-M921, DWR-M960, DIR-822K, and DIR-825M running firmware version 1.01.07. The flaw affects the processing of the /boafrm/formTracerouteDiagnosticRun file, where manipulation of the "host" argument triggers the buffer overflow. Published on 2025-11-17, it carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), indicating high severity.
The vulnerability enables remote exploitation by attackers with low privileges over the network, requiring no user interaction and low attack complexity. Successful exploitation of the buffer overflow can result in high impacts to confidentiality, integrity, and availability, potentially allowing arbitrary code execution or system compromise on the affected device.
References point to VulDB entries (ctiid.332645, id.332645, submit.691809, submit.691816) and a GitHub issue (LX-LX88/cve/issues/12) for further details, but no official vendor advisories or patches are specified in the available information.
An exploit for this vulnerability has been publicly disclosed, heightening the potential for real-world attacks against unpatched devices.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-197882
Vulnerability Data
A weakness has been identified in D-Link DWR-M920, DWR-M921, DWR-M960, DIR-822K and DIR-825M 1.01.07. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /boafrm/formTracerouteDiagnosticRun. Executing manipulation of the argument host can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be launched…
more
remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V17.3.2V5.2.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and analysis can find missing size checks before deployment.
Input validation directly enforces size checks before buffer copies.
Secure engineering principles require memory-safe design and coding that structurally avoids buffer-boundary violations.
Memory protection restricts exploitation impact of buffer overflows without eliminating the underlying coding flaw.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices (bounds checking, safe APIs, reviews) directly prevent this class of flaw.
Vulnerability scanning and code analysis directly surface buffer-boundary flaws.
Receiving and triaging vulnerability disclosures commonly includes buffer-related reports.
Developer training on secure coding reduces introduction of memory-buffer errors.
Patching replaces vulnerable code containing buffer-boundary defects.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding directly requires bounds-checked memory operations, addressing the root cause of CWE-120.
Security testing in development catches out-of-bounds accesses before release, covering most instances of the weakness.
Secure development lifecycle mandates memory-safety practices that directly prevent buffer-boundary violations.
Application security requirements can specify memory-safety rules, but do not prescribe implementation details.
Secure architecture and engineering principles include memory-safe design patterns that mitigate buffer overflows.