Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-13662

Ivanti Endpoint Manager ≤ 2024

Published
09 December 2025
Modified
11 December 2025
Patch / advisory
View advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0050 40th percentile
Risk Priority 55 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-13662 is a high-severity Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature (CWE-347) vulnerability in Ivanti Endpoint Manager. Its CVSS base score is 7.8 (High).

Operationally, ranked at the 40th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to CM-14 (Signed Components) and SI-7 (Software, Firmware, and Information Integrity) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

A04:2025 Cryptographic Failures

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

Improper verification of cryptographic signatures in the patch management component of Ivanti Endpoint Manager prior to version 2024 SU4 SR1 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code. User Interaction is required.

CWE(s)
CWE-347

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2024-13172Same product: Ivanti Endpoint Manager
CVE-2025-10918Same product: Ivanti Endpoint Manager
CVE-2024-50324Same product: Ivanti Endpoint Manager
CVE-2024-13163Same product: Ivanti Endpoint Manager
CVE-2024-50323Same product: Ivanti Endpoint Manager
CVE-2024-29828Same product: Ivanti Endpoint Manager
CVE-2026-8109Same product: Ivanti Endpoint Manager
CVE-2025-11622Same product: Ivanti Endpoint Manager
CVE-2024-32848Same product: Ivanti Endpoint Manager
CVE-2023-38343Same product: Ivanti Endpoint Manager

Affected Assets

ivanti
endpoint manager
2024 · ≤ 2024

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • CM-14 Signed Components
  • SI-7 Software, Firmware, and Information Integrity
  • CM-5 Access Restrictions for Change
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

—

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 14 hardening rules · 5 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

—

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

CM-14 Signed Components good match
prevent

Directly requires cryptographic signature verification for software components (patches) before installation, blocking the exact CWE-347 flaw.

SI-7 Software, Firmware, and Information Integrity good match
prevent

Mandates integrity verification of software/firmware using cryptographic mechanisms, preventing execution of improperly signed patches.

CM-5 Access Restrictions for Change partial match
prevent

Enforces access restrictions on configuration changes including patch application, limiting the ability of an unauthenticated attacker to exploit the signature bypass.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.DS-01 mostly match
prevents

Digital signatures are explicitly cited to protect integrity of data-at-rest, so proper verification directly mitigates the weakness.

PR.DS-02 mostly match
prevents

Digital signatures are explicitly cited to protect integrity of data-in-transit, so proper verification directly mitigates the weakness.

ID.RA-09 partial match
prevents

Requires assessing authenticity and integrity of acquired assets, which commonly relies on signature verification but is limited to pre-acquisition.

PR.PS-06 partial match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices include code signing and signature verification requirements, addressing the weakness during development.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

A.8.24 Use of cryptography partial match
prevents

Establishing approved cryptographic solutions and usage practices lowers the probability that signature-verification steps will be omitted or incorrectly implemented.

Hardening callouts derived

Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that reduce the attack surface for weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Derived transitively via CVE→CWE→STIG over `controls_xwalks` (authoritative rows only).

Oracle Linux 8 (2 rules)
  • V-248574 YUM must be configured to prevent the installation of patches, service packs, device drivers, or OL 8 system components that have not been digitally signed using a certificate that is recognized and approved by the organization. via CWE-347
  • V-248575 OL 8 must prevent the installation of software, patches, service packs, device drivers, or operating system components of local packages without verification they have been digitally signed using a certificate that is issued by a Certificate Authority (CA) that is recognized and approved by the organization. via CWE-347
Oracle Linux 9 (2 rules)
  • V-271523 OL 9 must check the GPG signature of locally installed software packages before installation. via CWE-347
  • V-271525 OL 9 must have GPG signature verification enabled for all software repositories. via CWE-347
RHEL 8 (1 rule)
  • V-230264 RHEL 8 must prevent the installation of software, patches, service packs, device drivers, or operating system components from a repository without verification they have been digitally signed using a certificate that is issued by a Certificate Authority (CA) that is recognized and approved by the organization. via CWE-347
RHEL 9 (1 rule)
  • V-257822 RHEL 9 must have GPG signature verification enabled for all software repositories. via CWE-347

References