CVE-2025-14141
Memory Safety in Utt 520W Firmware 1.7.7-180627
Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XSummary
CVE-2025-14141 is a high-severity Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer (CWE-119) vulnerability in Utt 520W Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 7.4 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 47% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2025-14141 is a buffer overflow vulnerability affecting the UTT 进取 520W router firmware version 1.7.7-180627. The issue stems from improper use of the strcpy function in the /goform/formArpBindConfig component, where manipulation of the "pools" argument triggers the overflow. Published on 2025-12-06, it is rated 8.8 on the CVSS 3.1 scale (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) and maps to CWE-119 (Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer) and CWE-120 (Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input).
An authenticated remote attacker with low privileges can exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted requests to the affected endpoint. Successful exploitation leads to high-impact compromise, including arbitrary code execution with potential for full system control, data disclosure, modification, or denial of service.
No vendor patches or official mitigations are available, as the supplier was notified early but provided no response. Advisories and a proof-of-concept exploit are documented in references including GitHub repositories at https://github.com/cymiao1978/cve/blob/main/new/13.md and https://github.com/cymiao1978/cve/blob/main/new/13.md#poc, as well as VulDB entries at https://vuldb.com/?ctiid.334529, https://vuldb.com/?id.334529, and https://vuldb.com/?submit.698522. The published exploit may facilitate active attacks on unpatched devices.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-201552
Vulnerability Data
A flaw has been found in UTT 进取 520W 1.7.7-180627. The impacted element is the function strcpy of the file /goform/formArpBindConfig. Executing manipulation of the argument pools can lead to buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The…
more
exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V17.3.2V5.2.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and analysis can find missing size checks before deployment.
Input validation directly enforces size checks before buffer copies.
Secure engineering principles require memory-safe design and coding that structurally avoids buffer-boundary violations.
Memory protection restricts exploitation impact of buffer overflows without eliminating the underlying coding flaw.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices (bounds checking, safe APIs, reviews) directly prevent this class of flaw.
Vulnerability scanning and code analysis directly surface buffer-boundary flaws.
Receiving and triaging vulnerability disclosures commonly includes buffer-related reports.
Developer training on secure coding reduces introduction of memory-buffer errors.
Patching replaces vulnerable code containing buffer-boundary defects.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding directly requires bounds-checked memory operations, addressing the root cause of CWE-120.
Security testing in development catches out-of-bounds accesses before release, covering most instances of the weakness.
Secure development lifecycle mandates memory-safety practices that directly prevent buffer-boundary violations.
Application security requirements can specify memory-safety rules, but do not prescribe implementation details.
Secure architecture and engineering principles include memory-safe design patterns that mitigate buffer overflows.