Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-1433

Memory Safety in Autodesk Autocad 2022 – 2022.1.6

Published
13 March 2025
Modified
19 August 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0022 13th percentile
Risk Priority 55 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-1433 is a high-severity Out-of-bounds Read (CWE-125) vulnerability in Autodesk Autocad. Its CVSS base score is 7.8 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203); ranked at the 13th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-16 (Memory Protection) and SI-2 (Flaw Remediation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2025-1433 is an Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability (CWE-125) affecting Autodesk AutoCAD. The issue arises when AutoCAD parses a maliciously crafted MODEL file, potentially leading to exploitation. Published on 2025-03-13, it has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.8 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

A local attacker with no privileges can exploit this vulnerability by tricking a user into opening a malicious MODEL file in AutoCAD, which requires user interaction. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to cause a denial-of-service crash, read sensitive data from memory, or execute arbitrary code within the context of the AutoCAD process.

Autodesk's security advisory ADSK-SA-2025-0001 addresses this vulnerability. Mitigation involves applying the latest updates, available through Autodesk support resources such as the AutoCAD and AutoCAD LT 2022 update download page, with additional context provided in the Autodesk Access product overview.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A maliciously crafted MODEL file, when parsed through Autodesk AutoCAD, can force an Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current…

more

process.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise TechniquesAI

T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1204.002 Malicious File Execution
An adversary may rely upon a user opening a malicious file in order to gain execution.
Why these techniques?

Vulnerability in AutoCAD file parsing (MODEL) is exploited via user opening malicious file leading to RCE or memory read, directly enabling T1203 (Exploitation for Client Execution) and T1204.002 (Malicious File).

Confidence: HIGH · MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise v19.0

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-1431Same product: Autodesk Advance Steel
CVE-2025-1428Same product: Autodesk Advance Steel
CVE-2025-1652Same product: Autodesk Advance Steel
CVE-2025-9455Same product: Autodesk Advance Steel
CVE-2025-9453Same product: Autodesk Advance Steel
CVE-2025-9454Same product: Autodesk Advance Steel
CVE-2025-9459Same product: Autodesk Advance Steel
CVE-2025-9460Same product: Autodesk Advance Steel
CVE-2025-6635Same product: Autodesk Advance Steel
CVE-2024-37005Same product: Autodesk Advance Steel

Affected Assets

autodesk
autocad
2022 — 2022.1.6 · 2023 — 2023.1.7 · 2024 — 2024.1.7
autodesk
autocad architecture
2022 — 2022.1.6 · 2023 — 2023.1.7 · 2024 — 2024.1.7
autodesk
autocad electrical
2022 — 2022.1.6 · 2023 — 2023.1.7 · 2024 — 2024.1.7
autodesk
autocad mechanical
2022 — 2022.1.6 · 2023 — 2023.1.7 · 2024 — 2024.1.7
autodesk
autocad mep
2022 — 2022.1.6 · 2023 — 2023.1.7 · 2024 — 2024.1.7
autodesk
autocad plant 3d
2022 — 2022.1.6 · 2023 — 2023.1.7 · 2024 — 2024.1.7
autodesk
civil 3d
2022 — 2022.1.6 · 2023 — 2023.1.7 · 2024 — 2024.1.7
autodesk
advance steel
2022 — 2022.1.6 · 2023 — 2023.1.7 · 2024 — 2024.1.7
autodesk
autocad map 3d
2022 — 2022.1.6 · 2023 — 2023.1.7 · 2024 — 2024.1.7

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • SI-2 Flaw Remediation
  • SI-16 Memory Protection
  • SI-10 Information Input Validation
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Mandates timely identification, reporting, and correction of software flaws like this out-of-bounds read vulnerability through vendor patches.

prevent

Implements memory protections such as address space randomization and non-executable memory to mitigate exploitation of out-of-bounds reads for code execution or data leakage.

prevent

Requires validation of information inputs like MODEL files to detect and reject maliciously crafted files before parsing in AutoCAD.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure-development practices such as bounds checking and memory-safe languages directly prevent out-of-bounds reads.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability scanning and recording can discover instances of out-of-bounds reads after code is deployed.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Routine patching replaces vulnerable code containing out-of-bounds read flaws.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

detects

Security testing in development and acceptance includes fuzzing and static analysis that detect out-of-bounds read defects before release.

A.8.15 Logging partial match
detects

Logging can record evidence of an out-of-bounds read but does not prevent the weakness itself.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates input validation and bounds checking that directly prevent out-of-bounds reads.

prevents

Application security requirements include explicit bounds and memory-safety specifications that mitigate buffer over-reads.

prevents

Secure system architecture and engineering principles require memory-safe design patterns and runtime protections against out-of-bounds access.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe pointer arithmetic and mandate bounds-checked reads, eliminating CWE-125.

References