CVE-2025-15480
Canonical Ubuntu Desktop Provision 24.04.4
Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XSummary
CVE-2025-15480 is a low-severity Exposure of Sensitive System Information Due to Uncleared Debug Information (CWE-1258) vulnerability in Canonical Ubuntu Desktop Provision. Its CVSS base score is 2.7 (Low).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique OS Credential Dumping (T1003); ranked at the 23th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to CM-7 (Least Functionality) and SA-3 (System Development Life Cycle) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2025-15480 is a vulnerability in Ubuntu's ubuntu-desktop-provision version 24.04.4 that leads to the leakage of sensitive user credentials during crash reporting. Upon installation failure, if a user submits a bug report to Launchpad, the tool could include the user's password hash in the attached logs. This issue is categorized under CWE-1258 and carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 9.1 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H), indicating critical severity due to high confidentiality and availability impacts.
The vulnerability can be exploited by any unauthenticated attacker with network access to Launchpad, requiring low attack complexity and no privileges or direct user interaction from the attacker's perspective. Exploitation relies on a victim encountering an installation failure and choosing to submit a bug report, after which the password hash becomes accessible in the logs. Successful exploitation allows attackers to obtain the victim's password hash, enabling potential further credential compromise.
Mitigation is addressed in the canonical/ubuntu-desktop-provision GitHub repository through pull requests #1399 and #1400, which resolve the credential leakage in crash logs. Security practitioners should ensure affected systems are updated to patched versions of ubuntu-desktop-provision.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-209377
Vulnerability Data
In Ubuntu, ubuntu-desktop-provision version 24.04.4 could leak sensitive user credentials during crash reporting. Upon installation failure, if a user submitted a bug report to Launchpad, ubuntu-desktop-provision could include the user's password hash in the attached logs.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V13.3.3V17.2.1V11.2.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Disabling debug and other non-essential functionality prevents the system from entering a debug state that would expose uncleared sensitive values.
Mandating a security-aware SDLC ensures hardware designs incorporate debug-mode clearing requirements.
Acquisition requirements can explicitly mandate secure debug behavior and data clearing in supplied hardware.
Requiring security engineering principles during design directly addresses the need to clear sensitive data on debug entry.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing in development can detect uncleared debug information before release.
Cryptographic key management and secure handling requirements reduce exposure of sensitive values during debug entry.
Secure system architecture and engineering principles directly address clearing of sensitive data on debug transitions.
Secure coding practices can mandate explicit clearing of debug registers and memory.
Test information protection includes ensuring debug artifacts do not leak sensitive data.