Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XSummary
CVE-2025-15540 is a high-severity Code Injection (CWE-94) vulnerability in Raytha Raytha. Its CVSS base score is 8.6 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059); ranked at the 39th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
CVE-2025-15540 is a code injection vulnerability (CWE-94) in the "Functions" module of Raytha CMS. This module enables privileged users to write custom JavaScript code to extend application functionality. Due to a lack of sandboxing or access restrictions, such JavaScript executed through the Functions feature can instantiate .NET components and perform arbitrary operations within the application's hosting environment. The vulnerability carries a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.8 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
Attackers with low privileges, such as authenticated users granted access to the Functions module, can exploit this over the network with low complexity and no user interaction required. By injecting malicious JavaScript, they can leverage .NET component instantiation to execute arbitrary code in the hosting environment, resulting in high impacts to confidentiality, integrity, and availability, potentially leading to full server compromise.
The vulnerability was fixed in Raytha CMS version 1.4.6. Additional mitigation details are available in the advisory at https://cert.pl/en/posts/2026/03/CVE-2025-69236 and on the vendor site at https://raytha.com.
OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-208697
- 🇵🇱 CERT-PL: cert.pl
Vulnerability Data
"Functions" module in Raytha CMS allows privileged users to write custom code to add functionality to application. Due to a lack of sandboxing or access restrictions, JavaScript code executed through Raytha’s “functions” feature can instantiate .NET components and perform arbitrary…
more
operations within the application’s hosting environment. This issue was fixed in version 1.4.6.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V1.3.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation finds code paths that accept and execute externally influenced strings.
Input validation directly stops untrusted data from being used to construct executable code without neutralization.
Least privilege limits the damage an injected code fragment can perform once executed.
Requiring documented secure development standards and tools enforces use of safe code-generation APIs and escaping.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
PR.PS-06's SDLC practices directly target injection flaws via secure coding and testing (mostly), yet as a single broad outcome it leaves many code-generation specifics unaddressed (partial).
PR.DS-10 protects runtime data confidentiality/integrity but has no bearing on neutralizing externally influenced input during code generation, so neither direction shows any preventive effect.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Banning unapproved code samples and unauthenticated web services, combined with secure-coding standards and SAST, prevents the dynamic generation or inclusion of attacker-supplied code.
Controls that restrict unauthorized or malicious code from being introduced via external networks or removable media limit opportunities for an attacker to inject and execute arbitrary code.