Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-1599

Path Traversal in Mayurik Best Church Management Software 1.0

Public PoCPath Traversal
Published
24 February 2025
Modified
03 March 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v4 5.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.010 61th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-1599 is a medium-severity Relative Path Traversal (CWE-23) vulnerability in Mayurik Best Church Management Software. Its CVSS base score is 5.3 (Medium).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked in the top 39% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog; a public proof-of-concept is referenced.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2025-1599 is a path traversal vulnerability in SourceCodester Best Church Management Software version 1.0. The issue affects an unknown functionality within the file /admin/app/profile_crud.php, where manipulation of the old_cat_img argument enables traversal sequences such as '../filedir'. Classified under CWEs-22, CWE-23, and CWE-24, it has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 5.4 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L), rated as problematic.

The vulnerability can be exploited remotely by authenticated users with low privileges (PR:L), requiring no user interaction and low attack complexity. Successful exploitation allows limited integrity and availability impacts, such as unauthorized file deletion, without compromising confidentiality.

Advisories from VulDB and a public GitHub repository detail the exploit, which has been disclosed and may be actively used. The vendor was contacted early but provided no response, and no patches or mitigations are mentioned in available references.

The exploit code is publicly available on GitHub, targeting file deletion in the application.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A vulnerability was found in SourceCodester Best Church Management Software 1.0. It has been rated as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /admin/app/profile_crud.php. The manipulation of the argument old_cat_img leads to path traversal: '../filedir'.…

more

The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1005 Data from Local System Collection
Adversaries may search local system sources, such as file systems, configuration files, local databases, virtual machine files, or process memory, to find files of interest and sensitive data prior to Exfiltration.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-63298Same vendor: Mayurik
CVE-2024-46375Same vendor: Mayurik
CVE-2024-46376Same vendor: Mayurik
CVE-2025-1588Shared CWE-22, CWE-23
CVE-2024-12482Shared CWE-22, CWE-23
CVE-2024-2318Shared CWE-22, CWE-23
CVE-2025-13199Shared CWE-23, CWE-24
CVE-2024-8510Shared CWE-22, CWE-23
CVE-2024-8409Shared CWE-22, CWE-24
CVE-2023-20166Shared CWE-22, CWE-24

Affected Assets

mayurik
best church management software
1.0

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V5.3.2

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Enforces the intended directory access authorizations that path traversal would otherwise bypass.

Explicit validation of path inputs stops .. sequences from ever being interpreted by the file system.

Information-flow rules can be configured to reject traversals that would move data outside an approved directory boundary.

Least privilege reduces the set of reachable files even when a traversal succeeds.

Secure-engineering principles require safe pathname construction and input neutralization before any file operation.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require input validation and path sanitization that prevent relative traversal.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Patching/maintenance can remediate known path-traversal flaws in deployed software (partial prevention of exploitability) but does nothing to stop the coding defect from being introduced in the first place.

PR.AA-05 none match
prevents

PR.AA-05 defines and reviews access policies but does not address code-level pathname neutralization, so neither direction prevents CWE-22.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

prevents

Secure coding standards require neutralizing ../ sequences and canonicalizing paths before file operations.

finds

Security testing in development catches path traversal via static/dynamic analysis, but does not itself implement the fix.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle mandates input validation and path-handling controls that directly prevent relative path traversal.

prevents

Application security requirements explicitly call for controls against path traversal and other injection flaws.

prevents

Secure architecture principles include directory isolation and canonicalization, reducing but not eliminating traversal risk.

mitigates

Information access restriction limits which files can be reached, mitigating impact but not preventing the traversal flaw.

References