Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-20175

Cisco Ios 12.2\(33\)sxi10 … 15.9\(3\)m9

Published
05 February 2025
Modified
03 July 2025
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.7
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0075 52th percentile
Risk Priority 56 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-20175 is a high-severity Buffer Access with Incorrect Length Value (CWE-805) vulnerability in Cisco Ios. Its CVSS base score is 7.7 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 48% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-8 (Security and Privacy Engineering Principles) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2025-20175 is a vulnerability in the SNMP subsystem of Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software that could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial-of-service (DoS) condition on an affected device. The issue stems from improper error handling when parsing SNMP requests, affecting SNMP versions 1, 2c, and 3. Published on February 5, 2025, it has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.7 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H) and is associated with CWE-805.

An attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted SNMP request to the affected device. Exploitation requires authentication: for SNMP v2c or earlier, knowledge of a valid read-write or read-only SNMP community string; for SNMP v3, valid SNMP user credentials. A successful exploit causes the device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a DoS condition.

For mitigation details, including available patches and workarounds, refer to the Cisco Security Advisory at https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-snmp-dos-sdxnSUcW.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A vulnerability in the SNMP subsystem of Cisco IOS Software and Cisco IOS XE Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to cause a DoS condition on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to improper error handling when parsing…

more

SNMP requests. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted SNMP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a DoS condition.  This vulnerability affects SNMP versions 1, 2c, and 3. To exploit this vulnerability through SNMP v2c or earlier, the attacker must know a valid read-write or read-only SNMP community string for the affected system. To exploit this vulnerability through SNMP v3, the attacker must have valid SNMP user credentials for the affected system.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
T1212 Exploitation for Credential Access Credential Access
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to collect credentials.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-20169Same product: Cisco Ios
CVE-2025-20174Same product: Cisco Ios
CVE-2025-20170Same product: Cisco Ios
CVE-2025-20202Same product: Cisco Ios Xe
CVE-2024-20307Same product: Cisco Ios
CVE-2017-6739Same product: Cisco Ios
CVE-2017-6740Same product: Cisco Ios
CVE-2017-6743Same product: Cisco Ios
CVE-2017-6736Same product: Cisco Ios
CVE-2017-6742Same product: Cisco Ios

Affected Assets

cisco
ios
12.2\(33\)sxi10, 12.2\(33\)sxi11, 12.2\(33\)sxi12, 12.2\(33\)sxi13, 12.2\(33\)sxi14
cisco
ios xe
16.1.1, 16.1.2, 16.1.3, 16.10.1, 16.10.1a

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V1.4.1

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation (including fuzzing and static analysis) directly finds incorrect length values used in sequential buffer accesses.

Secure engineering principles require explicit bounds checking and correct length calculations when performing buffer operations.

Input validation rejects or corrects malformed length values supplied from external sources before they reach buffer operations.

Memory protection mechanisms limit the blast radius when an incorrect length value causes an out-of-bounds access.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly prevent incorrect-length buffer operations via safe APIs, reviews, and testing.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability identification can discover buffer-length flaws but does not prevent their introduction.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development can detect out-of-bounds accesses, but does not guarantee prevention.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates buffer-safety practices that directly prevent incorrect length values.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify buffer-size validation, but do not prescribe implementation details.

prevents

Secure architecture principles encourage bounds-checked APIs, yet leave concrete coding decisions to developers.

prevents

Secure coding explicitly requires correct buffer-length handling, eliminating CWE-805 when followed.

References