Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-23270

Published
17 July 2025
Modified
17 June 2026
CVSS Score v3.1 7.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0019 8th percentile
Risk Priority 49 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-23270 is a high-severity Missing Report of Error Condition (CWE-392) vulnerability in Custhelp (inferred from references). Its CVSS base score is 7.1 (High).

Operationally, ranked at the 8th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

NVIDIA Jetson Linux contains a vulnerability in UEFI Management mode, where an unprivileged local attacker may cause exposure of sensitive information via a side channel vulnerability. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, data tampering, denial…

more

of service, and information disclosure.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-20005Shared CWE-392
CVE-2025-26268Shared CWE-392
CVE-2023-48430Shared CWE-392
CVE-2024-12797Shared CWE-392
CVE-2025-59398Shared CWE-392
CVE-2025-32743Shared CWE-392
CVE-2023-42447Shared CWE-392
CVE-2023-42444Shared CWE-392
CVE-2024-39697Shared CWE-392
CVE-2026-42246Shared CWE-392

Affected Assets

Custhelp
inferred from references and description; NVD did not file a CPE for this CVE

Mitigating Controls

Likely Mitigating Controls AI

Per-CVE control mapping for this CVE has not run yet; the list below is derived from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry.

addresses: CWE-392

Mandates alerting on audit failures, directly providing the missing report of the error condition.

addresses: CWE-392

Reporting the security and privacy status to organizational officials ensures monitoring and assessment results are communicated rather than omitted.

addresses: CWE-392

Requires reporting and escalation of error conditions and incidents per documented procedures.

addresses: CWE-392

IR testing would expose missing error reporting that prevents timely incident detection and response.

addresses: CWE-392

Offers direct support for reporting incidents, addressing the failure to report error conditions or security events.

addresses: CWE-392

Includes explicit reporting of security status and analysis results, addressing missing reports of error or monitoring conditions.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-04 mostly match
prevents

Requiring log generation directly forces error conditions to be reported so they become visible to monitoring.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices include explicit coding standards for reporting all error conditions.

DE.CM-09 partial match
prevents

Runtime monitoring can surface unreported errors only if the underlying code already emits them.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can identify missing error reporting through negative test cases and exception handling checks.

A.8.15 Logging partial match
degrades

Logging of errors and exceptions helps ensure that error conditions are captured and reported.

degrades

Monitoring activities can detect missing error reporting by observing abnormal system behavior.

prevents

Secure development lifecycle practices include requirements for proper error handling and status reporting.

prevents

Application security requirements typically mandate explicit error condition reporting to calling components.

prevents

Secure coding standards require functions to return appropriate error codes or status values.

References