CVE-2025-23384
Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XSummary
CVE-2025-23384 is a medium-severity Partial String Comparison (CWE-187) vulnerability. Its CVSS base score is 6.3 (Medium).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190); ranked at the 19th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and AC-3 (Access Enforcement) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-7629
Vulnerability Data
A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM RM1224 LTE(4G) EU (6GK6108-4AM00-2BA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), RUGGEDCOM RM1224 LTE(4G) NAM (6GK6108-4AM00-2DA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M804PB (6GK5804-0AP00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M812-1 ADSL-Router family (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE…
more
M816-1 ADSL-Router family (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M826-2 SHDSL-Router (6GK5826-2AB00-2AB2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M874-2 (6GK5874-2AA00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M874-3 (6GK5874-3AA00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M874-3 3G-Router (CN) (6GK5874-3AA00-2FA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M876-3 (6GK5876-3AA02-2BA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M876-3 (ROK) (6GK5876-3AA02-2EA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M876-4 (6GK5876-4AA10-2BA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M876-4 (EU) (6GK5876-4AA00-2BA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE M876-4 (NAM) (6GK5876-4AA00-2DA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUB852-1 (A1) (6GK5852-1EA10-1AA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUB852-1 (B1) (6GK5852-1EA10-1BA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUM853-1 (A1) (6GK5853-2EA10-2AA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUM853-1 (B1) (6GK5853-2EA10-2BA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUM853-1 (EU) (6GK5853-2EA00-2DA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (A1) (6GK5856-2EA10-3AA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (B1) (6GK5856-2EA10-3BA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (CN) (6GK5856-2EA00-3FA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (EU) (6GK5856-2EA00-3DA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE MUM856-1 (RoW) (6GK5856-2EA00-3AA1) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE S615 EEC LAN-Router (6GK5615-0AA01-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE S615 LAN-Router (6GK5615-0AA00-2AA2) (All versions < V8.2.1), SCALANCE SC622-2C (6GK5622-2GS00-2AC2) (All versions < V3.2), SCALANCE SC626-2C (6GK5626-2GS00-2AC2) (All versions < V3.2), SCALANCE SC632-2C (6GK5632-2GS00-2AC2) (All versions < V3.2), SCALANCE SC636-2C (6GK5636-2GS00-2AC2) (All versions < V3.2), SCALANCE SC642-2C (6GK5642-2GS00-2AC2) (All versions < V3.2), SCALANCE SC646-2C (6GK5646-2GS00-2AC2) (All versions < V3.2). Affected devices improperly validate usernames during OpenVPN authentication. This could allow an attacker to get partial invalid usernames accepted by the server.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V10.4.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and evaluation can discover incomplete string comparisons through targeted test cases.
Access enforcement depends on correct authorization checks; partial comparisons would violate the required enforcement of full authorizations.
Security engineering principles include correct and complete comparison logic to avoid flawed decision points.
Input validation requirements force complete rather than partial string comparisons before decisions are made.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing can detect and prevent partial string comparison flaws before deployment.
Secure development lifecycle practices can include requirements to avoid partial string comparisons in authentication or validation logic.
Application security requirements can mandate full, exact comparisons for sensitive operations.
Secure system architecture principles discourage unsafe partial comparisons in critical paths.
Secure coding standards can explicitly prohibit substring-based comparisons for security decisions.
Secure authentication mechanisms can reduce reliance on partial string comparisons for credential or token validation.