Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-24284

Apple Macos ≤ 15.4

Published
11 June 2026
Modified
07 October 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 8.8
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0013 2th percentile
Risk Priority 58 floored blend · peak EPSS

CVSS and EPSS are reproduced from their sources (NVD, FIRST EPSS). Risk Priority is our own derived reading, not an NVD score.

Summary

CVE-2025-24284 is a high-severity Protection Mechanism Failure (CWE-693) vulnerability in Apple Macos. Its CVSS base score is 8.8 (High).

Operationally, ranked at the 2th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to AC-3 (Access Enforcement) and AC-4 (Information Flow Enforcement) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

OWASP Top 10 for Web (2025)

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

This issue was addressed with improved checks to prevent unauthorized actions. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.4. An app may be able to break out of its sandbox.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-43261Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2023-42918Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2025-43273Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2024-44122Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-28912Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-20701Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2025-46281Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2025-43330Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2025-31244Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2025-31224Same product: Apple Macos

Affected Assets

apple
macos
≤ 15.4

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

AC-3 directly requires enforcement of access authorizations via the protection mechanism itself.

AC-4 mandates use of information flow enforcement mechanisms to control data movement.

SC-2 requires separation of user and system functionality as a protection mechanism.

SC-28 requires protection mechanisms for information at rest.

SC-3 requires isolation of security functions from non-security functions.

SC-7 requires boundary protection mechanisms to monitor and control external communications.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Systematic verification that security mechanisms operate according to defined standards reduces the likelihood that protection mechanisms are bypassed or disabled.

removes

A.8.26 only requires that security requirements (including protection mechanisms) be identified and specified during development or acquisition; it does not itself mandate, implement, or enforce the mechanisms that would remove CWE-693 instances from the product.

removes

A.8.28 mandates secure coding practices, principles, standards, design, peer review, defect removal, prohibition of insecure techniques (e.g. hard-coded passwords), and evaluation of common errors before deployment, which directly removes many instances of missing or incorrectly used protection mechanisms from first-party code; the bounded remainder is third-party components and post-deployment issues handled by other clauses (8.8, 8.29).

References