CVE-2025-26336
Memory Safety in Dell Chassis Management Controller For Poweredge Fx2 Firmware ≤ 2.40.200.202101130302
Raw vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:HSummary
CVE-2025-26336 is a high-severity Stack-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-121) vulnerability in Dell Chassis Management Controller For Poweredge Fx2 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 8.3 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 45th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
Dell Chassis Management Controller Firmware contains a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability tracked as CVE-2025-26336. The flaw affects firmware versions prior to 2.40.200.202101130302 on Dell PowerEdge FX2 systems and versions prior to 3.41.200.202209300499 on Dell PowerEdge VRTX systems, and is also associated with CWE-121 and CWE-787. The issue received a CVSS 3.1 score of 8.3.
An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit the vulnerability over the network without requiring user interaction, achieving remote code execution that may result in high impact to confidentiality and availability along with limited impact to integrity.
The referenced Dell advisory DSA-2025-123 describes the affected firmware versions and directs administrators to apply the specified updates that remediate the buffer overflow.
EPSS for the CVE rose from a low baseline to a peak of 0.0192 on 2026-05-01 before receding to the current value of 0.0083, indicating that exploitation interest increased after public disclosure.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-7273
Vulnerability Data
Dell Chassis Management Controller Firmware for Dell PowerEdge FX2, version(s) prior to 2.40.200.202101130302, and Dell Chassis Management Controller Firmware for Dell PowerEdge VRTX version(s) prior to 3.41.200.202209300499, contain(s) a Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could…
more
potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Remote execution.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
- 2 hardening rules · 2 OS baselines
—
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and analysis can discover stack-buffer overflows before deployment.
Input validation directly stops untrusted data from exceeding stack buffer bounds.
Memory-protection mechanisms limit the ability to execute injected code after a stack overflow.
Requiring documented secure-development standards and tools can mandate bounds-checked coding practices that avoid the weakness.
Secure-engineering principles include bounds-checked coding and safe buffer handling that avoid introducing the flaw.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure-development practices directly prevent introduction of stack buffer overflows.
Vulnerability scanning can discover stack buffer overflows but does not prevent their introduction.
Patching eliminates known instances of the weakness after discovery.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Security testing (fuzzing, static analysis) detects stack overflows before release.
Secure SDLC mandates buffer-safety practices that directly prevent stack overflows.
Application security requirements can specify buffer-size and input-validation rules.
Secure architecture principles include memory-safety and least-privilege stack usage.
Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe buffer handling that causes CWE-121.
Change management can enforce review gates that catch unsafe memory operations before deployment.
Hardening callouts derived
Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (authoritative rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).
Oracle Linux 8 (1 rule)
- V-248594 OL 8 must implement address space layout randomization (ASLR) to protect its memory from unauthorized code execution. prevents CWE-121
Oracle Linux 9 (1 rule)
- V-271452 OL 9 must use a Linux Security Module configured to enforce limits on system services. prevents CWE-121