Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-32010

Memory Safety in Tenda Ac6 Firmware 02.03.01.110

Published
20 August 2025
Modified
17 June 2026
CVSS Score v3.1 8.1
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0069 49th percentile
Risk Priority 61 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-32010 is a high-severity Stack-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-121) vulnerability in Tenda Ac6 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 8.1 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 49th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2025-32010 is a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability (CWE-121) in the Cloud API functionality of the Tenda AC6 router running firmware version V5.0 V02.03.01.110. The issue arises when processing a specially crafted HTTP response, which can trigger the overflow and lead to arbitrary code execution. Published on 2025-08-20 with a CVSS v3.1 base score of 8.1 (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H), it affects the router's cloud connectivity features.

A remote network-based attacker can exploit this vulnerability by sending a malicious HTTP response to the Cloud API endpoint, requiring high attack complexity but no authentication, privileges, or user interaction. Successful exploitation enables arbitrary code execution on the device, compromising confidentiality, integrity, and availability with high impact, potentially allowing full control over the router for further network attacks or persistence.

Mitigation details and in-depth analysis are available in the Talos Intelligence advisory at https://talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2025-2168. Security practitioners should consult this report for vendor patch status, workaround recommendations, and exploitation techniques.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the Cloud API functionality of Tenda AC6 V5.0 V02.03.01.110. A specially crafted HTTP response can lead to arbitrary code execution. An attacker can send an HTTP response to trigger this vulnerability.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
T1212 Exploitation for Credential Access Credential Access
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to collect credentials.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2025-29121Same product: Tenda Ac6
CVE-2025-50260Same product: Tenda Ac6
CVE-2025-70252Same product: Tenda Ac6
CVE-2025-55483Same product: Tenda Ac6
CVE-2025-55503Same product: Tenda Ac6
CVE-2025-55482Same product: Tenda Ac6
CVE-2025-44172Same product: Tenda Ac6
CVE-2025-55498Same product: Tenda Ac6
CVE-2025-50528Same product: Tenda Ac6
CVE-2023-24332Same product: Tenda Ac6

Affected Assets

tenda
ac6 firmware
02.03.01.110

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)
  • 2 hardening rules · 2 OS baselines
Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and analysis can discover stack-buffer overflows before deployment.

Input validation directly stops untrusted data from exceeding stack buffer bounds.

Memory-protection mechanisms limit the ability to execute injected code after a stack overflow.

Secure-engineering principles include bounds-checked coding and safe buffer handling that avoid introducing the flaw.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure-development practices directly prevent introduction of stack buffer overflows.

ID.RA-01 partial match
prevents

Vulnerability scanning can discover stack buffer overflows but does not prevent their introduction.

PR.PS-02 partial match
prevents

Patching eliminates known instances of the weakness after discovery.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing (fuzzing, static analysis) detects stack overflows before release.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates buffer-safety practices that directly prevent stack overflows.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify buffer-size and input-validation rules.

prevents

Secure architecture principles include memory-safety and least-privilege stack usage.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe buffer handling that causes CWE-121.

none

Change-management gates can enforce security reviews that catch buffer issues.

Hardening callouts derived

Configuration rules from DISA STIG baselines that bear on weaknesses of the type cited by this CVE. Each rule is shown with the relationship its mapping actually records, against the CWE it was authored against. Derived via CVE→CWE over `controls_xwalks` (authoritative rows only; rows rated `none` are excluded).

Oracle Linux 8 (1 rule)
  • V-248594 OL 8 must implement address space layout randomization (ASLR) to protect its memory from unauthorized code execution. prevents CWE-121
Oracle Linux 9 (1 rule)
  • V-271452 OL 9 must use a Linux Security Module configured to enforce limits on system services. prevents CWE-121

References