Raw vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:XSummary
CVE-2025-3346 is a high-severity Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer (CWE-119) vulnerability in Tenda Ac7 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 8.7 (High).
Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked in the top 7% of CVEs by exploit likelihood; it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.
The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SI-10 (Information Input Validation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.
Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary
Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.
A vulnerability rated critical has been identified in the Tenda AC7 router running firmware version 15.03.06.44. It resides in the formSetPPTPServer function of the /goform/SetPptpServerCfg endpoint, where improper handling of the pptp_server_start_ip and pptp_server_end_ip arguments triggers a buffer overflow. The issue is tracked under CWE-119 and CWE-120 and carries a CVSS 4.0 score of 8.7 reflecting network-accessible attack vectors with low complexity and high impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
An authenticated remote attacker can supply crafted values to these parameters to overflow the buffer, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution or denial of service on the device. Publicly available exploit code demonstrates the attack, confirming that the flaw can be triggered without user interaction once network access to the management interface is obtained.
No vendor advisory or patch information is detailed in the referenced sources, which include a technical write-up on GitHub, VulDB entries, and the Tenda corporate site. The EPSS score has reached a peak of 0.0930 with a current value of 0.0681, indicating modest post-disclosure interest without a pronounced upward trajectory.
EU & UK References
- 🇪🇺 ENISA EUVD: EUVD-2025-15058
Vulnerability Data
A vulnerability was found in Tenda AC7 15.03.06.44. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is the function formSetPPTPServer of the file /goform/SetPptpServerCfg. The manipulation of the argument pptp_server_start_ip/pptp_server_end_ip leads to buffer overflow. The attack may be…
more
launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
- CWE(s)
Related Threats
MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques
CVEs Like This One
Affected Assets
Mitigating Controls
Control response
—
—
—
V17.3.2V5.2.1
Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI
Developer testing and analysis can find missing size checks before deployment.
Input validation directly enforces size checks before buffer copies.
Secure engineering principles require memory-safe design and coding that structurally avoids buffer-boundary violations.
Memory protection restricts exploitation impact of buffer overflows without eliminating the underlying coding flaw.
Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure SDLC practices (bounds checking, safe APIs, reviews) directly prevent this class of flaw.
Vulnerability scanning and code analysis directly surface buffer-boundary flaws.
Receiving and triaging vulnerability disclosures commonly includes buffer-related reports.
Developer training on secure coding reduces introduction of memory-buffer errors.
Patching replaces vulnerable code containing buffer-boundary defects.
Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI
Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.
Secure coding directly requires bounds-checked memory operations, addressing the root cause of CWE-120.
Security testing in development catches out-of-bounds accesses before release, covering most instances of the weakness.
Secure development lifecycle mandates memory-safety practices that directly prevent buffer-boundary violations.
Application security requirements can specify memory-safety rules, but do not prescribe implementation details.
Secure architecture and engineering principles include memory-safe design patterns that mitigate buffer overflows.