Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-40575

Siemens Scalance Lpe9403 Firmware

Published
13 May 2025
Modified
17 June 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v4 5.3
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
EPSS Score 0.0043 35th percentile
Risk Priority 33 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-40575 is a medium-severity Use of Uninitialized Variable (CWE-457) vulnerability in Siemens Scalance Lpe9403 Firmware. Its CVSS base score is 5.3 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked at the 35th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-15 (Development Process, Standards, and Tools) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

A vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE LPE9403 (6GK5998-3GS00-2AC2) (All versions < V4.0 HF0). Affected devices do not properly validate incoming Profinet packets. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this flaw by sending a specially crafted malicious packet, which leads…

more

to a crash of the dcpd process.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2023-27408Same product: Siemens Scalance Lpe9403
CVE-2025-27393Same product: Siemens Scalance Lpe9403
CVE-2025-40578Same product: Siemens Scalance Lpe9403
CVE-2025-40574Same product: Siemens Scalance Lpe9403
CVE-2025-27394Same product: Siemens Scalance Lpe9403
CVE-2023-27409Same product: Siemens Scalance Lpe9403
CVE-2025-40582Same product: Siemens Scalance Lpe9403
CVE-2025-27396Same product: Siemens Scalance Lpe9403
CVE-2025-27392Same product: Siemens Scalance Lpe9403
CVE-2023-27410Same product: Siemens Scalance Lpe9403

Affected Assets

siemens
scalance lpe9403 firmware
all versions

Mitigating Controls

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and static analysis directly find uses of uninitialized variables before deployment.

Documented development standards and tools can enforce initialization requirements in code.

Engineering principles can mandate explicit variable initialization to avoid uninitialized use.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly catch uninitialized-variable defects via static analysis and code review while the control encompasses many additional development controls.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing can detect uninitialized-variable bugs, but the control is broader.

prevents

Secure development life cycle mandates practices that reduce uninitialized-variable defects.

prevents

Application security requirements can specify initialization rules, but the control itself does not directly address the weakness.

prevents

Secure coding explicitly requires variable initialization and static-analysis checks.

none

Secure architecture principles encourage defensive coding that can mitigate uninitialized variables.

References