Cyber Resilience

CVE-2025-43238

Memory Safety in Apple Macos 13.0 – 13.7.7

Published
02 April 2026
Modified
24 July 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 6.2
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0020 10th percentile
Risk Priority 35 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2025-43238 is a medium-severity Integer Overflow or Wraparound (CWE-190) vulnerability in Apple Macos. Its CVSS base score is 6.2 (Medium).

Operationally, ranked at the 10th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SI-10 (Information Input Validation) and SC-39 (Process Isolation) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

An integer overflow was addressed with improved input validation. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.6, macOS Sonoma 14.7.7, macOS Ventura 13.7.7. An app may be able to cause unexpected system termination.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-43764Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-20639Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2025-24156Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-64694Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2025-46285Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2024-54515Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2024-27809Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2025-43274Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2024-23230Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2025-43308Same product: Apple Macos

Affected Assets

apple
macos
13.0 — 13.7.7 · 14.0 — 14.7.7 · 15.0 — 15.6

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)
  • SI-10 Information Input Validation
  • SI-16 Memory Protection
  • SC-39 Process Isolation
Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V5.2.6

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

prevent

Directly requires validation of input size and format to block the malformed values that trigger the integer overflow.

prevent

Memory-protection mechanisms (e.g., bounds checking, safe arithmetic libraries) limit the ability of an integer overflow to produce a system-terminating condition.

prevent

Process isolation confines the effects of the overflow to the offending app, preventing the observed whole-system termination.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require use of safe arithmetic, bounds checks, and testing that prevent integer overflows.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

detects

Security testing in development can detect integer overflows before release.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates input validation and arithmetic checks that prevent integer overflows.

degrades

Application security requirements include bounds checking and safe arithmetic to avoid overflow conditions.

degrades

Secure architecture principles require defensive coding patterns that mitigate integer wraparound risks.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe integer operations and mandate overflow-safe constructs.

References