Cyber Resilience

CVE-2026-20639

Memory Safety in Apple Macos 14.0 – 14.8.5

Published
25 March 2026
Modified
25 March 2026
Patch / advisory
CVSS Score v3.1 7.5
Click a component to see what it means
Raw vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
EPSS Score 0.0060 46th percentile
Risk Priority 58 floored blend · peak EPSS

Summary

CVE-2026-20639 is a high-severity Integer Overflow or Wraparound (CWE-190) vulnerability in Apple Macos. Its CVSS base score is 7.5 (High).

Operationally, exploitation aligns with the MITRE ATT&CK technique Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068); ranked at the 46th percentile by exploit likelihood (below the median); it is not currently listed in the CISA KEV catalog.

The strongest mitigations our analysis identified map to SA-11 (Developer Testing and Evaluation) and SA-8 (Security and Privacy Engineering Principles) — see the control section below for these in your framework.

Deeper analysis AI-assisted summary

Synthesised by an AI model from the NVD description and linked references — a reading aid, not an authoritative source.

CVE-2026-20639 is an integer overflow vulnerability (CWE-190) that was addressed through improved input validation in various macOS versions. It affects macOS Sequoia prior to 15.7.5, macOS Sonoma prior to 14.8.5, and macOS Tahoe prior to 26.3. The flaw occurs during the processing of a maliciously crafted string, which can trigger heap corruption.

The vulnerability has a CVSS v3.1 base score of 7.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H), indicating it is exploitable over a network with low attack complexity, requiring no privileges or user interaction. Remote attackers can send a specially crafted string to affected systems, leading to heap corruption and potential denial-of-service through application crashes or system instability, though no direct confidentiality or integrity impacts are noted.

Apple's security advisories detail the fixes in the specified macOS updates (https://support.apple.com/en-us/126348, https://support.apple.com/en-us/126795, https://support.apple.com/en-us/126796). Security practitioners should prioritize patching to macOS Sequoia 15.7.5, Sonoma 14.8.5, or Tahoe 26.3, as these releases incorporate the input validation improvements to prevent exploitation.

EU & UK References

Vulnerability Data

An integer overflow was addressed with improved input validation. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.7.5, macOS Sonoma 14.8.5, macOS Tahoe 26.3. Processing a maliciously crafted string may lead to heap corruption.

CWE(s)

Related Threats

MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Techniques

T1068 Exploitation for Privilege Escalation Privilege Escalation
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in an attempt to elevate privileges.
T1190 Exploit Public-Facing Application Initial Access
Adversaries may attempt to exploit a weakness in an Internet-facing host or system to initially access a network.
T1203 Exploitation for Client Execution Execution
Adversaries may exploit software vulnerabilities in client applications to execute code.
T1210 Exploitation of Remote Services Lateral Movement
Adversaries may exploit remote services to gain unauthorized access to internal systems once inside of a network.
Derived from this CVE’s CWE(s) via the direct CWE→ATT&CK cross-walk.

CVEs Like This One

CVE-2026-64694Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2025-46285Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2025-24156Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2026-43764Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2025-43238Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2025-43478Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2025-24191Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2023-28212Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2023-28213Same product: Apple Macos
CVE-2025-24266Same product: Apple Macos

Affected Assets

apple
macos
14.0 — 14.8.5 · 15.0 — 15.7.5 · 26.0 — 26.3

Mitigating Controls

Control response

Prevent
Stop it (NIST 800-53)

Detect
Catch it (NIST detect / respond)

Harden
Shrink the surface (DISA STIG)

Validate
Prove the fix (OWASP ASVS)
  • V5.2.6

Mitigating Controls (NIST 800-53 r5) AI

Developer testing and evaluation (static analysis, fuzzing, unit tests) directly finds integer overflow defects before deployment.

Secure engineering principles require use of safe arithmetic constructs or language features that structurally eliminate integer overflow during calculation.

Input validation enforces bounds on values before arithmetic, stopping the conditions that trigger overflow or wraparound.

Mitigating Controls (NIST CSF 2.0) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→CSF cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

PR.PS-06 mostly match
prevents

Secure SDLC practices directly require use of safe arithmetic, bounds checks, and testing that prevent integer overflows.

Mitigating Controls (ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A) AI

Derived directly from the weakness types (CWEs) cited in the NVD entry via our AI-authored CWE→ISO cross-walk (authority under review) — links open the control.

finds

Security testing in development can detect integer overflows before release.

prevents

Secure SDLC mandates input validation and arithmetic checks that prevent integer overflows.

degrades

Application security requirements include bounds checking and safe arithmetic to avoid overflow conditions.

degrades

Secure architecture principles require defensive coding patterns that mitigate integer wraparound risks.

prevents

Secure coding standards explicitly forbid unsafe integer operations and mandate overflow-safe constructs.

References